Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:14:22 +0100 Received: by ptb-mxcore15.plus.net with spam-scanned (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Do6MX-0003XV-Ok for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:14:22 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore15.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v2.00) id 1Do6MX-0003XG-Kj for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:14:21 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Do6M5-0006nK-F0 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:13:53 +0100 Received: from [82.108.183.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Do6M4-0006nB-MR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:13:52 +0100 Received: from joseph.ncoldns.com ([208.181.178.5] helo=generation.lgisp.net) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Do6K5-0002jl-N4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 22:11:52 +0100 Received: from p1i5f0 (unknown [204.244.17.100]) by generation.lgisp.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A647B7EEF for ; Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <006a01c57db8$e4898780$6411f4cc@p1i5f0> From: "Steve McDonald" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <27529898.1120149909720.JavaMail.www@wwinf3001> Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 14:15:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: 756 PRO III on LF? Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PN-SpamFiltered: by PlusNet MXCore (v2.00) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
 


> Otherwise I find the 756 fine.

Thanks Laurie. I was playing with a friend's new 756 PRO III (he won it at Dayton this year!!) and it seemed very nice down below the BCB but he notices a rise of internal noise from around 250KHz down to 50KHz. The noise is also visible on the scope as a rise in the rx ambient noise floor. I take it that you don't have this problem with yours?

Steve / VE7SL



Whatever you Wanadoo

This email has been checked for most known viruses - find out more here