From: "Hideho YAMAMURA" <pba01030@nifty.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <CAKvcm2e9gshSiL4kSM0FQfzWZtpgX2CpVs=5_eD7Yi5gt6RDbQ@mail.gmail.com>	<00b601d01d18$87884620$9698d260$@nifty.com>	<CAKvcm2fTDHPt9sDOdFwFZiAimAme63eK_t=tH0+xhUax7iLdAg@mail.gmail.com>	<003001d01e44$a16ae110$e440a330$@nifty.com> <CAKvcm2eKtXP16v=NeDdUYaFaXM4kOMvtQO5hjw9TkVKMiW=-aA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKvcm2eKtXP16v=NeDdUYaFaXM4kOMvtQO5hjw9TkVKMiW=-aA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:25:21 +0900
Message-ID: <006801d01e60$15eb9a00$41c2ce00$@nifty.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Thread-Index: AQK/c0x7zLDhEKX/tG52Wjzd9moXYQEtYwZ4AhKV+OcAiccMEALaHC7rmoiyyfA=
Content-Language: ja
Subject: RE: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz.
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="UTF-8"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Status: O

Hello Dimitris-san,

> 1) 43 db + 10*log(PEP)
> 2) 50 dB
we have the same regulation (with grace period now),
but, it seems that the ministry was afraid of the actual interference,
hence, on site test.

In my quick calculation, I assumed 0.3uV/m harmonic at AM BC receiver point,
which is about -60dBc from AM BC carrier 250uV/m in weak areas,
assuming S/N of about 40dB for audio output,
and, for distance of 30m, 1pW EIRP was the limit,
and for 10m distance 1fW EIRP was the limit,
that are -120dBc to -150dBc relative to 1W EIRP transmit.
I hope my calculation is wrong.

Do people have measured data of the noise level at around 950kHz?
I am to try to measure it quantitatively, hopefully during the new year holiday.

 73,

  Hideho YAMAMUA, JF1DMQ


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Dimitrios
> Tsifakis
> Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 10:58 AM
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: Re: LF: RE: Japan on 475 kHz.
> 
> Hi Hideho san,
> 
> >> I use a low pass filter which ensures that the harmonics are -50 dBc
> >> or lower. I think the tuned antenna also helps with not radiating too
> >> much
> > My quick calculation resulted in -120dBc necessary, to reduce QRM to
> > adjacent houses,  (I may be wrong)., and I am thinking how to make it.
> 
> In Australia, for frequencies below 30 MHz we need to reduce our harmonics
> by the lesser of:
> 1) 43 db + 10*log(PEP)
> 2) 50 dB
> 
> where PEP is peak power to the antenna. When I was allocated an experimental
> license for 500 kHz, I was asked to demonstrate that my harmonics are reduced
> by 60 dB (from memory).
> 
> 73, Dimitris Vk1SV