Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mk06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id A8E8B3804B758; Sat, 5 May 2012 14:47:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SQk06-0006qT-2K for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 19:46:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SQk05-0006qK-JV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 19:46:37 +0100 Received: from out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.238]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SQk03-0006b7-Qo for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 19:46:36 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EADJ1pU9cHn4n/2dsb2JhbABFsnOBCIIHBQEBBQgBAQNJAiwBAQMFAgEDBA0EAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYgBuWiKf4J6gyYEiDCFSphGgmk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,536,1330905600"; d="scan'208,217";a="392414212" Received: from host-92-30-126-39.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.30.126.39]) by out1.ip02ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 05 May 2012 19:46:34 +0100 Message-ID: <006801cd2aef$63e0a730$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <004e01cd2ae3$9a7eb3b0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4FA56D4F.4040304@xs4all.nl> Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 18:45:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Albert Although I can hear some genuine signals on MF it is really bad with a large antenna. LF likewise is also vy poor. More add on gadgets to make to overcome this problem and then I wonder what it will sound like 73 de mal/g3kev [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [62.24.128.238 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FSL_XM_419 Old OE version in X-Mailer only seen in 419 spam -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 FSL_UA FSL_UA X-Scan-Signature: c95b9a52470b89d54f2ef38e923e05cb Subject: Re: LF: Flex 3000 sdr radio Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0065_01CD2AEF.38C690A0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:443353568:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d618a4fa575bc33d4 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01CD2AEF.38C690A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Albert Although I can hear some genuine signals on MF it is really bad with a = large antenna. LF likewise is also vy poor. More add on gadgets to make to overcome this problem and then I wonder = what it will sound like=20 73 de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Albert=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 6:11 PM Subject: Re: LF: Flex 3000 sdr radio Op 5-5-2012 19:22, mal hamilton schreef:=20 MF/LF First observations indicate that the radio is a good performer on HF = with appropriate antennas but on MF/LF with large antenna arrays there = is cross modulation and overload. This could be overcome with a stepped = ext attenuator or using smaller antennas on receive. Some other radios that I havd tried are useless on LF/MF with small = antennas but very good with large antenna arrays. 73 de mal/g3kev Mal, FlexRadio info, valid for Flex 5K and 3 K (Flex 1k5 below 500 kHz) =20 Note 7: Customer provided pre-selector or appropriate low pass = filter(s) required to eliminate images when used below 1.8 MHz For a good performance of your SDR you need a band pass filter for 136 = kHz and 500 kHz, an attenuator is not enough to get rid of all the ghost = signals that show up on and around these bands. Albert =20 ------=_NextPart_000_0065_01CD2AEF.38C690A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Albert
Although I can hear some genuine signals on MF = it is=20 really bad with a large antenna. LF likewise is also vy = poor.
More add on gadgets to make to overcome this = problem and=20 then I wonder what it will sound like
73 de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Albert
Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 = 6:11=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Flex 3000 sdr=20 radio

Op 5-5-2012 19:22, mal hamilton schreef:=20
MF/LF
First observations indicate that the radio = is a good=20 performer on HF with appropriate antennas but on MF/LF with large = antenna=20 arrays there is cross modulation and overload. This could be = overcome with a=20 stepped ext attenuator or using smaller antennas on = receive.
Some other radios that I havd tried are = useless on=20 LF/MF with small antennas but very good with large antenna=20 arrays.
73 de mal/g3kev
 
 
Mal,

FlexRadio info, valid for = Flex 5K=20 and 3 K (Flex 1k5 below 500 kHz) 

Note 7: Customer = provided=20 pre-selector or appropriate low pass filter(s) required to eliminate = images=20 when used below 1.8 MHz

For a good performance of your SDR = you need=20 a band pass filter for 136 kHz and 500 kHz, an attenuator is not = enough to get=20 rid of all the ghost signals that show up on and around these=20 bands.

Albert



     =20
------=_NextPart_000_0065_01CD2AEF.38C690A0--