Message-ID: <006701c087c8$f786f600$995c01d5@z0w6t5>
From: "Bill Staples" <G0aky@btinternet.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <008701c0864a$3cc020a0$0301a8c0@steve>
Subject: LF: Re: Reality check...
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 18:42:04 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Hi Steve
All agreed in principal but there is one nail you forgot the LF band hr is
only just over 2Khz wide
Best regards Cobber
Bill G0AKY

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Olney" <ollaneg@zeta.org.au>
To: "RSGB LF Group" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 9:11 PM
Subject: LF: Reality check...


> G'day All,
>
> With all the hand-wringing and lamentations about the abandonment of the
> good wife CW for the QRSSS jezebel on LF, it might be useful to reflect on
> the reality of the environment in which we, as Amateurs, seek to pursue
our
> hobby.
>
> I don't know about the situation elsewhere but here in VK the AVERAGE age
of
> an Amateur is over 60.   This indicates either there are a lot of us over
60
> or there are next to no young people coming through the ranks.
>
> Increasing pressures on spectrum space for all sorts of wireless devices,
> both long-range, satellite and short-range will see corresponding
increasing
> pressure on our allocations.
>
> The young are not motivated by traditional Amateur pursuits in sufficient
> numbers to inject youth into our hobby so it is in danger of slowly
becoming
> an old boys' club even more than now.
>
> The arguments for present and new privileges (notice that the word is
> privileges - not rights) have been based on experimentation, relevant
> training and forming a pool of skills applicable to the current technology
> environment.   For example, our VK LF submission to our governing
authority
> makes large mention of experimentation (no mention of DXCC, QSL count,
etc)
> as even the old salts here realise that this is the best approach for
> success in the present regulatory environment.    The submission does make
a
> strong point for experimentation but specifically asks that operation be
NOT
> restricted to CW "to allow experimentation in a wider variety of
> communication techniques..".
>
> I know in my case when applying for my Scientific Licence for operating on
> LF here, I had to submit a technical reason for wanting to operate on that
> band.   That submission included details of narrowband experiments.   If I
> had just submitted it with saying I just wanted to have a CW QSO then I
> would have had a snowball's hope in that hot place of succeeding.
>
> The world is changing and everything is increasingly being subjected to
> justification.   Frankly I cannot see how we have maintained our
privileges
> as we have in the present climate.   We are up against strong commercial
> pressures for spectrum space and pushing the CW, QSL card, DXCC barrow to
> the detriment of more contemporary pursuits will not only not help us, it
> will hinder us.
>
> I sympathise with those feeling the pressure of the modern age as they
grow
> older.   This is because I too feel this pressure (although in Amateur
terms
> I am a spring chicken at 51), but in my case I have decided it is of no
use
> longing for the "good ol' days".   It is a sad fact of life that CW is on
> life support as it is abandoned by authorities around the world.   Quoting
> single instances to the contrary will not change this.
>
> I respectfully submit the following code of practice for us who are
> interested in the Amateur hobby surviving in the new millennium.
>
> General:   Eliminate all negative aspects of the exchanges within the
> Amateur fraternity as much as possible.   Encourage new ideas, embrace
> technological change and generally show we are worthy of a place in the
> increasingly competitive environment in which we seek to operate our
hobby.
>
> Non-CW Types:    Continue to push for new techniques, new ways, and let
your
> imagination and the current regulations in your location be your limit,
not
> some-one else's limited vision of the world.
>
> CW-Types:  Try a new tack of keeping your particular interest alive.   Try
a
> friendly, supportive approach instead of the Neanderthal "hit them over
the
> head with a club and drag them back to the cave" approach.   This
aggressive
> approach is very effective in hiding the fun aspects of CW operation.   In
> fact I really believe that some of the loudest and more obnoxious CW
> advocates are in reality anti-CW for the damage they do to the CW case.
>
> As for the Trans-Atlantic challenge.   I am always for a challenge.   I
> guess that makes me a "young" 51-year old.  My 80-year old MIL has just
> started learning about computers and we have connected her to the
internet.
> It is a struggle for her sometimes, but she persists and is loving it.
That
> makes her a "young" 80-year old.  Without a challenge to stimulate you,
you
> are just marking time.    I echo a previous poster who remarked that he
> would not have gone for his Amateur ticket to just engage in QSOs or to be
> limited to one mode.
>
> There have been (and will be in the future) instances where some-one has
> inadvertently transgressed into the wrong part of the "gentleman's
> agreement" band space.   This has been apologised for and to suggest that
it
> was deliberate or a sign of incompetence is, in itself, a sad sign of
senile
> paranoia.    It is amusing that some of the least gentlemanly
communicators
> are demanding the strictest adherence to a "gentleman's agreement".
>
> Here endeth the lesson...
>
> 73s Steve Olney (VK2ZTO/AXSO - QF56IK : Lat -33 34 07, Long +150 44 40)
> =============================================
> HomePage URLs:
> http://www.qsl.net/vk2zto
> http://www.zeta.org.au/~ollaneg
>
> Containing:-
> ULF, ELF, VLF & LF Experimentation
> InfraSonic Experimentation
> Laser Comms DX
> Amateur Radio Astronomy
> =============================================
>
>
>
>