Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3468 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2003 00:07:13 -0000 Received: from netmail01.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.219) by mailstore with SMTP; 13 Jan 2003 00:07:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 2610 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2003 00:07:08 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by netmail01.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2003 00:07:08 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.12) id 18Xs7o-0001LD-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:06:44 +0000 Received: from [194.73.73.116] (helo=lutetium.btinternet.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 18Xs7o-0001L4-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:06:44 +0000 Received: from host213-122-17-239.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([213.122.17.239] helo=Main) by lutetium.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #16) id 18Xs7n-00015I-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:06:43 +0000 Message-ID: <006601c2ba97$9ac00a20$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:06:16 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: T/A prop Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=6.0tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.43 X-Spam-Level: * X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi all, a quick look at Steve's site suggests that the DCF39 level is still climbing and didn't peak last night until about 0100z It is about 10dB below that level at the moment. Of course John and Dex and anyone else listening (watching !!) will not see the same fading pattern as Steve registers. It will be very dependent on the actual path length and position. It is also possible that UK stations will peak before DCF39 being nearly 1000km nearer to N.A.. The climb shown on Steve's site is slower tonight and there are no big troughs. This might mean that the peaks will not be quite as high as last night, but the conditions will last longer. Solar conditions are still quiet and have been for some time now. This might be described as "undisturbed conditions", and as such may not be as good as the dying stages of a "disturbance event" The last really good days were the 5/6th of Jan. which were probably about 6dB higher than last night. However Steve's system "topped out" on the 5th limiting the graph peak. Even last nights levels are some 12 dB above the average since 29th Dec. Good Luck all Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com