Message-ID: <006501c16202$e2ac8be0$3884153e@w8k3f0>
From: "Dick Rollema" <d.w.rollema@freeler.nl>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <3.0.1.16.20011031101758.2d2f5314@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
Subject: Re: LF: QRSS Transmissions
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 12:42:23 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

To All from PA0SE

I gave "O" three times  in hand-sent morse code to make sure it was read
correctly;  just as it is usual to sent an RST report more than once.

73, Dick, PA0SE

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: Rik Strobbe <rik.strobbe@fys.kuleuven.ac.be>
Aan: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verzonden: woensdag 31 oktober 2001 10:17
Onderwerp: Re: LF: QRSS Transmissions


> >Dick gave me an OOO report
>
> Hello group,
>
> it seems to me that there is still some misunderstanding about the report
> system for QRSS : it is just either O, M or T where
> O = 100% copy
> M = less than 100% copy but sufficient for a QSO
> T = signal copied but unsufficient for a QSO
>
> It doen't matter wether someone sents O or OO or OOO etc... the report is
> just O and is repeated a few time to ensure that it is copied correct.
> If you already got an O report from your QSO partner it is sufficient to
> send his report once or twice (so O or OO), sending it 3 times is just a
> waste of time unless you have indications that conditions may change
rapidly.
>
> 73, Rik  ON7YD
>
>
>
>