Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-db06.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CF359380000A8; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 11:56:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1U77WR-0004zz-NZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:55:27 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.34] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1U77WR-0004zp-BA for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:55:27 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1U77WP-0003ZO-PE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:55:26 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al8GAKEIIVFcECPX/2dsb2JhbABFinS1KX0Xc4IaBQEBBAEIAQEDJQEjAiYGAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYd7Cr1+jlhsEIMqA44KmHqDBw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,682,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="419476934" Received: from host-92-16-35-215.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.16.35.215]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 17 Feb 2013 16:49:53 +0000 Message-ID: <006401ce0d2e$ce156b50$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <5120F58D.8040001@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <004101ce0d23$3acf8ca0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <5120F95F.5010609@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5120FDB4.3040802@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 16:49:51 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay2.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan Its a waste of time, you are blazing away in Beacon mode and not listening for a QSO. I can hear you, but unfortunately you have the same old problem not being able to RX properly. Now QRT on 136.5 de G3KEV [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 0a4643e586472c13187d293ec5d096c2 Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d405a51210bb1524c X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan Its a waste of time, you are blazing away in Beacon mode and not listening for a QSO. I can hear you, but unfortunately you have the same old problem not being able to RX properly. Now QRT on 136.5 de G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 3:56 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: CW beacon on LF > PS: Certainly a QSO is no problem if you have a suitable TX/ANTENNA so i > can hear you. > > 73, Stefan > > > > > Am 17.02.2013 16:26, schrieb mal hamilton: > >> Stefan > >> I can fire up for a QSO if you have a suitable RX/ANTENNA to hear me > >> de mal/g3kev > >> >