Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 17:06:58 +0100
Message-ID: <006301c5ca8f$dd581ac0$5e11f4cc@p1i5f0>
From: "Steve McDonald" <jsm@gulfislands.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <003701c5ca73$c31af220$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> <000d01c5ca83$bbdee240$6901a8c0@AIRPORTTERMINAL> <43453FB5.3050008@hifidelity.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 09:06:08 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: VA7LF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


 OK OK...you caught our second stuff-up as well ! Geez... .you guys are
good.
(The dds got nudged during one of our sleep-deprived halucinations.)


> Dear VA7LF, and all who sail in her,
>
> I concur with Jay about the frequency shift, or perhaps it
> was the 'other end'  -  we can but live in hope . . .
>
> On w3eee.com, under 'Argo Gallery', are three snapshots from
> 'Grabulator II' last night; the first a big bright nearly
> complete 'VA7LF', the last a still recognizable 'VA7LF' but
> weaker and down in frequency somewhat.  The middle capture
> shows the tail-end of the first (the lower frequency of the
> DFCW pair) and the beginning of the second one, giving an
> idea of the offset.
>
> Great job, fellas!
>
>          Cheers,
>
>                  Steve
>
>
> Jay Rusgrove wrote:
>
>  > VA7LF ops
>  >
>  > Just noticed on the 'after sun up' capture that the
> signal had moved down in frequency. Until then all VA7LF
> transmissions have been consistently on the same
> frequency...assuming that is your time slot and signal of
> course...
>  > Jay
>
>
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 267.11.9 - Release Date: 09/29/05
>
>
>