Message-ID: <005e01ca92dc$a83d23c0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <000e01ca9223$6d16ec90$0517aac0@desktop> <9afca2641001101102r6252b153lf6d911ee622589e5@mail.gmail.com> <004101ca922b$214cf0e0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <9afca2641001101153u288ebc3dh81ba03efc09b650@mail.gmail.com> <fc7eccec1001101319i48236a3ei5f4d1f5d1d95d023@mail.gmail.com> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1A8E@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <fc7eccec1001101449i4a724340l607be147d4d1dbc8@mail.gmail.com> <002701ca92a7$306cf080$0301a8c0@your91hoehfy9g> <20100111120918.29c48e1d@opc1>  <QE0de1AQtxSLFw18@g4dmp.fsnet.co.uk> <1263222973.15328.20.camel@pat-compaq-evo>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:39:34 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW...
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


That was a political decision, the GPO, BBC and others were afraid a mere
radio amateur might get ahead of them at the time. The same criteria did not
apply in other countries like the USA and others worldwide.
G3KEV

----- Original Message -----
From: "g4gvw" <g4gvw@aol.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 3:16 PM
Subject: Re: LF: WSPR, QRSS, CW...


> This discussion seems a bit pointless and is not getting anyone
> anywhere. After all, the original AA (Artificial Aerial) licences from
> which the modern licence (and by default its ethos) derives was intended
> to allow the experimenter to generate Rf with a prohibition on any
> effective radiation.
> One might also consider the definition of "message" - the presence or
> otherwise of a carrier of whatever duration or amplitude might be
> considered a "message"!
> If you really want to be pedantic, were I not to be an amateur radio
> licence holder, would I be permitted to listen to those stations who
> have notices of variation etc. From where I'm sitting I cannot determine
> whether or not they are "authorised" from the point of view of a
> listener under the regulations.
> My licence does not appear to require me to transmit anything at any
> time. It simply (or with complications) sets out terms and conditions to
> which I am expected to adhere when I do radiate RF.
> I am getting very concerned that somewhere "out there" is a strange and
> mythical figure called "The Perfect Radio Amateur".
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 12:36 +0000, David Pratt wrote:
> > In a recent message, John P-G <gm4slv@sighthound.demon.co.uk> wrote ...
> > >
> > >Where is the requirement to pass any message whatsoever?
> >
> > Clause 1(1)(a) of the Terms, conditions and limitations of your Licence:
> >
> > The Licensee shall ensure that the Radio Equipment is only used:
> > for the purpose of self-training in radio communication, including
> > conducting technical investigations....
> >
> > The SRP does not replace the Amateur Radio Licence; it is merely an
> > addition to it.
> >
> > To me, radio communication means passing messages.
> >
> > 73
> >
> > David G4DMP
> >
> --
> 73 es gd dx de pat g4gvw
>  qth nr felixstowe uk
> (east coast, county of suffolk)
>
>