Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26685 invoked from network); 22 Jun 1999 09:53:15 +0100 Received: from magnet.plus.net.uk (HELO magnet.force9.net) (195.166.128.26) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 22 Jun 1999 09:53:15 +0100 Received: (qmail 29255 invoked from network); 22 Jun 1999 08:53:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnet.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 22 Jun 1999 08:53:11 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 10wLv8-0001aN-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:28:42 +0100 Received: from [143.179.236.31] (helo=Iguanodon.big-orange.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 10wLv7-0001aI-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:28:41 +0100 Received: from w8k3f0 ([143.179.151.209]) by Iguanodon.big-orange.net (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with SMTP id AAA4682 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:28:28 +0200 Message-ID: <005e01bebc89$a8b18420$d197b38f@w8k3f0> From: "Dick Rollema" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Re: Antennas Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 10:30:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: G3XDV de PA0SE Mike, You wrote: One a similar topic, what influences the capacitance of a multi-wire top section? Is it simply wire diameter so a thick wire has more capacitance than a thin wire? What about multiple parallel wires - these are often suggested to be a metre or so apart - why? If the distance makes a difference, do I assume that the further apart they are the better the effect, and if so why is this? Also, if I run three top wires in parallel, should I join them at the far end? Or perhaps I could join them so they make a single zig-zag wire down the garden, back again and down again. The antenna is getting better all the time, but I am sure there's more progress to be made. Does anyone have some practical experience to pass on? My reply is: I cannot provide practical experience. Computer programmes for antenna simulation are no help either as dimensions of the aerial are are too small, expressed in wavelength. But I found some useful information in a 1925 book called ELECTRICAL ENGINEERS DATA BOOK, VOLUME THREE, RADIO ENGINEERING. It has a chapter on "Capacity of Aerials" and I think it answers most, if not all, of your questions. I have made a photocopy of the chapter and will put it into the mail today. It goes to your address at RSGB as I am not sure of your home postal address. An attempt to look at your homepage failed; system overloaded? 73, Dick, PA0SE JO22GD D.W. Rollema V.d. Marckstraat 5 2352 RA Leiderdorp The Netherlands Tel. +31 71 589 27 34 E-mail: d.w.rollema@gironet.nl or pa0se@amsat.org