Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.96.198 with SMTP id du6csp96512igb; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:33:05 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.211.49 with SMTP id mz17mr11352122wic.54.1385339584764; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:33:04 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c10si6402316wib.81.2013.11.24.16.33.04 for ; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 16:33:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VkjR8-0002zO-4o for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:49:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VkjR7-0002zF-HR for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:49:57 +0000 Received: from qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.64]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VkjR5-0004ss-6F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:49:56 +0000 Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id tb7A1m0060EZKEL57bptG4; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:49:53 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id tbps1m00M0CFS1j3Mbpt6v; Sun, 24 Nov 2013 23:49:53 +0000 Message-ID: <005d01cee96f$df07b8f0$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <0D55815F48FC47BF8BAA1EEFB362E352@White> Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:49:52 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1385336993; bh=UaiTISQJZ6jvR3TPb0FPi854eJcAFZa3IECHDYKtZ7o=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=fPtm9WaXYkqQURxwFbV6lPqkXP2ivFF2810mD7hNoXE0PrB3fk4ObEch+eSuVlkO2 mACh743jZhDX/YIiyaXSlJI5OEzpfehsVgtM21mlRozGvRXpX14vXVEQmil8UamhrL QnaIa5fRwEBlKs9IzEfRnaBeagtjwUzv4WQQgatd70z+9p6Ja7OYgwuUI1gbTIYHpi cxKIr4PeHBWV96Fw5AyCkpilDq9mDeaE4gxBjtRXOZ6/3956F6G4yaVeLIjgccnVnj JlJyfLzE9XROVZOE5tZZyNKuRQIWWyVlNsjvsVgxr0LmNqUKNN3QhHkew17kmbuffs bdzi6HVNM7SdQ== X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: WD2XNS running OPDS32 on 137553 for a while tonight. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: Markus Vester To: Sunday, November 24, 2013 6:43 PM Subject: Re: LF: XPQ 137.552 carrier OP32 [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.64 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7c995d39cde70605aa76dd18810a4256 Subject: Re: LF: XPQ 137.552 carrier OP32 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0059_01CEE945.F5A2B760" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 3360 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0059_01CEE945.F5A2B760 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit WD2XNS running OPDS32 on 137553 for a while tonight. Jay ----- Original Message ----- From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 6:43 PM Subject: Re: LF: XPQ 137.552 carrier OP32 Laurence, just checked for potential Loran lines listed in http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/Loran_lines_in_LF_slots.txt The closest ones in Europe will be 137551.6736 Hz (GRI 7499, Sylt) and 137551.7783 Hz (GRI 7001, Bo), and in Japan 137552.8701 Hz (GRI 9930). In the eastern US, 137551.3906 Hz (GRI 8270) could be a near one in case the Wildwood NJ experimental Loran station came on air again. Anyway considering the Op-32 modulation bandwidth of about 0.125 Hz, all of these lines would be spaced far enough from your intended QRG. Best 73, Markus From: Laurence KL7 L Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:18 AM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: XPQ 137.552 carrier OP32 I should have asked - but Ive put myself close to the centre of the windowed Op32 passband - not sure if anyone else has plonked themselves closeby? - Im about 3Hz higher than BDQ decoded freq - tell me to move if Im QRMing... :-) or suggest a freq. No arcing as of yet - ambient temp inside the tuner helping but the spiders are probably not happy now. Nice to be back on Tx - Im backed off a fair way on power as Im pushing a smaller mica past its current derating at 137kHz, and that should be replaced next week hopefully - Ill go out with the active laser thermo-meter in a while and look for component heating - always a good idea Laurence KL7L WE2XPQ Wasilla Palmer Alaska ------=_NextPart_000_0059_01CEE945.F5A2B760 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
WD2XNS running OPDS32 on 137553 for a = while=20 tonight.
 
Jay
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Markus=20 Vester
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 = 6:43=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: XPQ 137.552 = carrier=20 OP32

Laurence,
 
just checked for potential Loran = lines=20 listed in
http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/26404526/Loran_lines_in_LF_slo= ts.txt
The closest ones in Europe will = be=20 137551.6736 Hz (GRI 7499, Sylt) and = 137551.7783=20 Hz (GRI 7001, Bo), and in Japan 137552.8701 Hz (GRI 9930). In the = eastern=20 US, 137551.3906 Hz (GRI 8270) could be a near one in case the=20 Wildwood NJ experimental Loran station came on=20 air again. 
 
Anyway considering the = Op-32 modulation=20 bandwidth of about 0.125 Hz, all of these lines would be spaced far = enough=20 from your intended QRG.
 
Best 73,
Markus

From: Laurence KL7 L =
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2013 12:18 AM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: LF: XPQ 137.552 carrier OP32

I should have asked - but Ive put myself close to the = centre of=20 the windowed Op32 passband - not sure if anyone else has plonked = themselves=20 closeby? - Im about 3Hz higher than BDQ decoded freq - tell me to move = if Im=20 QRMing... :-) or suggest a freq.


No arcing as of yet - = ambient temp=20 inside the tuner helping but the spiders are probably not happy = now. =20 Nice to be back on Tx -  Im backed off a fair way on power = as  Im=20 pushing a smaller mica past its current derating at 137kHz, and that = should be=20 replaced next week hopefully - Ill go out with the active laser = thermo-meter=20 in a while and look for component heating - always a good = idea

Laurence=20 KL7L WE2XPQ Wasilla Palmer = Alaska
------=_NextPart_000_0059_01CEE945.F5A2B760--