Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp360078igc; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:22:20 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.195.13.164 with SMTP id ez4mr20533609wjd.11.1387840939047; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:22:19 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r8si7719682wjw.9.2013.12.23.15.22.18 for ; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:22:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1VvDqQ-0007xp-IB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:19:26 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1VvDqP-0007xg-L7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:19:25 +0000 Received: from qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.40]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1VvDqM-00076s-Fn for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:19:24 +0000 Received: from omta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.12]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 55vx1n0040FhH24A4AKLHL; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:19:20 +0000 Received: from Owner ([166.137.182.216]) by omta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5AJy1n00J4gYbxS8UAK4FU; Mon, 23 Dec 2013 22:19:14 +0000 From: "hvanesce" To: References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 15:18:31 -0700 Message-ID: <005a01cf002d$00126e90$00374bb0$@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQICwcmh1/K39OCFM7dDJesh5Qss1Zn6zJcA Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1387837160; bh=D08Lr44oq9mb2ZWnn795r1ojjIbILdfp08wfhi+Kn6Y=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=o0HuIy5MFF9bJaaN6SZAWoHI68Igt7bkzH7gVkgLF7BcEOcqCFSAlnc/a6bOUmpKK nHW4LhVRHeeUhdc969ZZ6Vnw4CgUceGQoAC0cK2OK/+e9J3WsD7HbsC4ej9HroM7cK 0jR/PZFZF9iYEYrA8vuq/YSlb90Mb0s5Ivd0QBU+B1E9ycxe+ywQ4Up8Io+ixoQU+i YFMW+LYjMY4QsqzDT7+Bvh4EpYUdukPbTLZiYIeE9Q151Gl3/A92oVSRroilEzzdhn 9ucKn2xPQZnebvQoVn0JFSq3Epe9Pn06kS6y365H65qvk384FOm+zTw5tsNWz1dxEF 6IcwruWMaw5Pg== X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Uwe and Markus, Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I'm trying to interpret using Markus' grabber. Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) approximately 01:00 - 10:00. If I had known that it wasn't raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise modifications. [...] Content analysis details: (1.1 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.30.40 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (hvanesce[at]comcast.net) 1.6 SUBJ_ALL_CAPS Subject is all capitals -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 7ee575a0a6578bbbbe5ea7af32688fd5 Subject: RE: VLF: 8969.99 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_005B_01CEFFF2.53B459E0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE, SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 1768 This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_005B_01CEFFF2.53B459E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Uwe and Markus, Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I'm trying to interpret using Markus' grabber. Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) approximately 01:00 - 10:00. If I had known that it wasn't raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise modifications. I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks everyone for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of detection with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) periods. 73, Jim AA5BW From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 1:59 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: VLF: 8969.99 Yes, Markus, but he is back agn. GL, Uwe _____ Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52 An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Betreff: VLF: 8969.99 _____ Hey Uwe, your cat's on walkabout again! 73, Markus ------=_NextPart_000_005B_01CEFFF2.53B459E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Uwe and Markus,

 

Was he out from about 02:15 to 03:15? I’m trying to interpret = using Markus’ grabber.

 

Hope springs eternal here that with management of natural noise, = continuous monitoring and luck I might detect TA signals. I was making = receiver modifications for noise mitigation (i.e. receiver off) = approximately 01:00 – 10:00. If I had known that it wasn’t = raining at 0200 I would postponed my receiver noise = modifications.

 

I am running multiple windows at different bandwidths (thanks = everyone for your previous advice on this) to enhance the chance of = detection with arbitrary on/off (rain/dry) = periods.

 

73, Jim AA5BW

 

 

 

 

From:= = owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org = [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of = uwe-jannsen@kabelmail.de
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2013 = 1:59 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: = Re: VLF: 8969.99

 

Yes, Markus, = but he is back agn.
GL, Uwe

Von: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Gesendet: 23.12.2013 20:52
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
Betreff: VLF: 8969.99

 

Hey Uwe, = your cat's on walkabout again!  73, = Markus

 

------=_NextPart_000_005B_01CEFFF2.53B459E0--