Return-Path: Received: from rly-da02.mx.aol.com (rly-da02.mail.aol.com [172.19.129.76]) by air-da05.mail.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILINDA051-a58472b5e0ef4; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:28:08 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-da02.mx.aol.com (v120.9) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDA028-a58472b5e0ef4; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:27:53 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Io0Io-0005ym-5r for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:27:26 +0000 Received: from [83.244.159.144] (helo=relay3.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Io0In-0005yd-Me for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:27:25 +0000 Received: from rutherford.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.142]) by relay3.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Io0Ik-0004pK-D6 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:27:25 +0000 Received: from [82.68.18.174] (helo=acer5gi5q0ubzj) by rutherford.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Io0Ij-00020y-Mz for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:27:21 +0000 From: "John W Gould" To: Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 17:27:07 -0000 Message-ID: <005601c81d75$9b285530$0b01a8c0@acer5gi5q0ubzj> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6822 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AcgdOD7b9fu4DuKXTNSDHNAThN/89gAGMquQ In-Reply-To: <000701c81d37$e15303e0$0ae4fc3e@g3kev> Importance: Normal X-Originating-Rutherford-IP: [82.68.18.174] X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: LF: 500kHz NoV Clarification Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : Following some excellent x-band QSOs by some NoV holders I've been asked if clarification can be given as to whether this is appropriate given the a particular clause in the 500kHz NoV's Terms & Conditions. This issue is that clause h) in the NoV states that "This Notice of Variation is restricted for the Research for which it is issued and does not apply to routine messages and signals for which the existing terms conditions and limitations of the Licence shall apply." I've checked with Ofcom and the position is that a standard Special Research Permit NoV was used for issuing 500kHz NoVs and that therefore contained the clause h) wording. This clause is really meant to cover conditions that might apply when, for example, an SRP NoV is issued to allow a power level of 32dBW for EME experiments on a stated band/frequency. Such an NoV is issued for that purpose and does not give blanket permission to run that power level on any other bands, when "... the existing terms conditions and limitations of the Licence shall apply" Thus, for 500kHz operating the T&Cs of the SRP NoV must be observed for that band only and it does not "vary" the T&Cs of Section 2 of the licence which allows operation on bands stated in the appropriate schedule. If my explanation above isn't entirely clear, the simple answer is that doing x-band QSOs is OK as long as they are in someway related to the "research" on which you sought your NoV. Thus, for 99.9% of cases it is unlikely to be an issue. I trust that our overseas friends are also content with that this little piece of British bureaucracy makes their involvement "legal" depending of course on the small print in their licence! 73 John, G3WKL RSGB HF Manager