Delivered-To: daveyxm@virginmedia.com Received: by 10.50.237.98 with SMTP id vb2csp42616igc; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:19:48 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.180.92.169 with SMTP id cn9mr3819132wib.35.1390083587285; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:19:47 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com. [195.171.43.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cm11si1668297wjb.17.2014.01.18.14.19.46 for ; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:19:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=195.171.43.25; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 195.171.43.25 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@comcast.net Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1W4djq-0006x1-PD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 21:47:34 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1W4djp-0006ws-NH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 21:47:33 +0000 Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.56]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W4djn-0004lG-7R for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 21:47:32 +0000 Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FZdn1n0020bG4ec56ZnVVq; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 21:47:29 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id FZnU1n00Y0CFS1j3PZnUjx; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 21:47:29 +0000 Message-ID: <005201cf1496$e2377950$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <006701cf142d$a38c04a0$0802a8c0@acer> ,<52DAC619.3030101@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4655791C712B45BDBE3FFD40E8B927C9@White> Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 16:47:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1390081649; bh=n82IYea6HOtqL6ls2D+kjqEpOs0Ot8uA7zw/+FTfSLM=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=pFb1u5e+xuBZbEnJ3S71fvbDcLH18ePjTQaAEBwMcFJH4BL2bw7tA57CXzX8s2uCE HglPpQxYkhUi7kEBj0bV4X6Obp35TBQY0cJJWWFrhplrpDT5s80wmfZero3q+hbbnc jVfN98wDQ0irph1iWddJeaVnNmRiR8KxdKzMiH8VxPX7hZ1XD4iXC5fcrZ9aTo+MSF ggpysy4A+gfxFuttplG2yGpiKbC8odrNfPdg00Jmo7hYiUlk4rHnGs7t6Lc6rYYLZv eTNZ8icI01CS5wA1iac4pPVxIydfIMMPKUyLqgx/VJhts+yJJvDuIHhwDFiUNeF2LK WkV1v/kTsseGA== X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Markus Alternate nights is fine by me. Things have gotten a bit boring on LF lately ... same old, same old. Gone are the days of stations actively transmitting from a number of EU countries, BIG antenna tests from RU6LA, HB9 etc, ZL6QH Quartz Hill ops etc. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.62.56 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 052e5a7ab87161a07560b72babff3441 Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004E_01CF146C.F90DFA20" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CF146C.F90DFA20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Markus Alternate nights is fine by me. Things have gotten a bit boring on LF lately ... same old, same old. Gone are the days of stations actively transmitting from a number of EU countries, BIG antenna tests from RU6LA, HB9 etc, ZL6QH Quartz Hill ops etc. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 WG2XRS/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:48 PM Subject: Re: LF: LF tonite Hi Stefan, Bob, all, just wondering if it makes much sense if everyone was transmitting at the same time. This may work out well during a dedicated "WSPR night" with alternate slots, but not so well with QRSS or DFCW beacons, as none of us can simultaneously receive and transmit on the same band. Who's listening then? In my opinion, it would be better if as many as possible Europeans (not only Germans) would transmit during one night, and all available listeners (Jay and Dex very much appreciated, who else?) would be watching and uploading grabs from the other side. The next night we swap roles, many beacons from America and grabbers in Europe. Just my five cents... shoot it down if you want! Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) From: Bob Raide Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 7:28 PM To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: RE: LF: LF tonite Stefan; I was waiting to see what you were planning for tonight. You start much earlier there of course and around 2300 I be back home. I am tuned up on 137 band and will see what you are doing at that time and if still on WSPR 15 I will fire up alternate quarter hours as usual or go to QRSS60 if you changed-Bob ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:21:13 +0100 From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: LF tonite Hi Bob, LF, Bob, what are you planniung for tonite? What is the plan? :-) Just thought about some WSPR-15 but DFCW-90 just gives better results (valid detections) than WSPR. Due to the public database, WSPR is more popular though, for some OMs. So it all has it's advantage... Think i'll start with WSPR now and may switch back to DGCW later. 73, Stefan/DK7FC ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CF146C.F90DFA20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Markus
 
<lament>
 
Alternate nights is fine by = me. Things have=20 gotten a bit boring on LF lately ... same old, same old. Gone are the = days of=20 stations actively transmitting from a number of EU countries, BIG = antenna tests=20 from RU6LA, HB9 etc, ZL6QH Quartz Hill ops  etc.
 
</lament>
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  = WE2XGR/2 =20 WG2XRS/2
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Markus=20 Vester
Sent: Saturday, January 18, = 2014 2:48=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: LF = tonite

Hi Stefan, Bob, all,
 
just wondering if it makes much sense = if everyone=20 was transmitting at the same time. This may work out well during = a=20 dedicated "WSPR night" with alternate slots, but not so well with QRSS = or DFCW=20 beacons, as none of us can simultaneously receive and transmit on = the=20 same band. Who's listening then?
 
In my opinion, it would be better = if as many=20 as possible Europeans (not only Germans) would transmit during = one night,=20 and all available listeners (Jay and Dex very much = appreciated, who=20 else?) would be watching and uploading grabs from the other side. The = next=20 night we swap roles, many beacons from America and grabbers in=20 Europe.
 
Just my five cents... shoot it down = if you=20 want!
 
Best 73,
Markus = (DF6NM)
 

From: Bob Raide
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 7:28 PM
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org= =20
Subject: RE: LF: LF tonite

Stefan;
I was waiting to see what you were planning = for=20 tonight.  You start much earlier there of course and around 2300 = I be=20 back home.  I am tuned up on 137 band and will see what you are = doing at=20 that time and if still on WSPR 15 I will fire up alternate quarter = hours as=20 usual or go to QRSS60 if you changed-Bob
 

Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 19:21:13 +0100
From: Stefan.Schaefer@iup= .uni-heidelberg.de
To:=20 rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: LF tonite

Hi Bob, = LF,=20

Bob, what are you planniung for tonite? What is the plan? = :-)
Just=20 thought about some WSPR-15 but DFCW-90 just gives better results = (valid=20 detections) than WSPR. Due to the public database, WSPR is more = popular=20 though, for some OMs. So it all has it's advantage...
Think i'll = start with=20 WSPR now and may switch back to DGCW later.

73,=20 Stefan/DK7FC

------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CF146C.F90DFA20--