Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-di04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E421D3800009A; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:25:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TI9D1-00017e-CB for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:24:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TI9D0-00017V-S1 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:24:42 +0100 Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.243]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TI9Cy-0000yT-JM for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 03:24:41 +0100 Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5EJi1k0011ZXKqc5DEQj8t; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 02:24:43 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 5ERg1k0070CFS1j3hERgk7; Sun, 30 Sep 2012 02:25:41 +0000 Message-ID: <005201cd9eb2$bd6da820$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <50674D2D.2030402@freenet.de> <50677CBB.7030200@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <9B65821C1A2842CEA839D2E9FCDC7123@gnat> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:24:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Alan Another possible solution ... Everyone on this list could indicate their preference ... 1) okay to cross-post without permission, 2) okay to cross-post with permission or 3) cross-posts never allowed. It would seem that this could be done with a 'gentleman's agreement'. If not, anyone that cross-posts against the desires of the originator will be subject to removal from this list. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.243 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.8 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: 66d07794ca19cd68f7d6cc289cd4ac18 Subject: Re: LF: test Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1da6085067adb35a4d X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Alan Another possible solution ... Everyone on this list could indicate their preference ... 1) okay to cross-post without permission, 2) okay to cross-post with permission or 3) cross-posts never allowed. It would seem that this could be done with a 'gentleman's agreement'. If not, anyone that cross-posts against the desires of the originator will be subject to removal from this list. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Melia" To: Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 7:45 PM Subject: Re: LF: test > You can actually set up a private group on Yahoo where members only see the messages. I use these > for a number of different committee. There is no access to messages outside the group members, and > messages are not open to google style searches.In fact no one else knows the group exists! > > Alan > G3NYK > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefan Schäfer" > To: > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2012 11:56 PM > Subject: Re: LF: test > > >> ...i am extremely irritated to see my emails and even my email adress in this reflector beeing >> permanently forwarded to the web, i.e. certain public groups. Thus i consider to reduce my >> activity here and communicate with the few really active people directly, at least for some time. >> >> Stefan/DK7FC >> >> >> Am 29.09.2012 21:34, schrieb wolf_dl4yhf: >>> .. suspiciously quiet here on the reflector, especially for a weekend .. >> > >