Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from mtain-me03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.139]) by air-dd03.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD033-86594c0b82602e9; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 07:11:28 -0400
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20])
	by mtain-me03.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B97273800004A;
	Sun,  6 Jun 2010 07:11:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1OLDk2-00084w-QN
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 12:10:10 +0100
Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1OLDk2-00084n-8l
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 12:10:10 +0100
Received: from qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.243])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <jrusgrove@comcast.net>)
	id 1OLDk0-00030c-6a
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 12:10:10 +0100
Received: from omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87])
	by qmta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id Saxw1e0031swQuc5DbA1dt; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 11:10:01 +0000
Received: from JAYDELL ([76.23.233.102])
	by omta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id SbA01e0052DDHkk3bbA0hV; Sun, 06 Jun 2010 11:10:01 +0000
Message-ID: <005201cb0568$ce3a0e40$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL>
From: <jrusgrove@comcast.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <004801cb04d6$e9740b80$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <CD190EC05BA84C1685A9A2F4A56DD284@JimPC> <004301cb0544$56965980$0201a8c0@Clemens04> <FF5414DBC74E45B69F5D9E01FDFB4A0C@White> <DFFD7B2AF9C74F0C9C1BFD90F8559389@JimPC>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 07:09:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,NO_REAL_NAME=0.55
Subject: LF: Re: Re: Re: VLF 9 kcs: preamp and antenna noise
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d608b4c0b825e2d97
X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20


Jim

Sensitivity of the Perseus drops off below 10 kHz - see attached spectrum shot taken earlier this 
year. While the antenna in use at that time dropped off a few dB below 10 kHz the 'black hole' is 
mainly due to Perseus.

http://www.w1vd.com/vlf.html

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Moritz" <james.moritz@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 6:04 AM
Subject: LF: Re: Re: VLF 9 kcs: preamp and antenna noise


> Dear Clemens, Markus,
>
> Yes, what Markus wrote is exactly what I mean...
>
> In general, the SNR does depend on the source impedance. Also, the overall power gain of the 
> preamp/receiver depends on the degree of mis-match at the input, so the fact that the output noise 
> level stays the same in the Perseus does not imply that the SNR will also be the same.  But unless 
> the noise figure of the preamp/receiver is quite low, this effect will often be masked by internal 
> noise in practice. As Markus points out, with large RX antennas the source noise power at 9kHz is 
> spectacularly high, and preamp noise is not usually a factor anyway. But for small whips and 
> loops, preamp noise is important.
>
> The figures Clemens quotes for the Perseus RX are curious... With 732Hz bandwidth and T = 300K, 
> kTB would be -145.2dBm, so the -118.4dBm noise floor level indicates a noise figure of about 27dB, 
> which seems quite high. The QST review quotes -127dBm noise floor in 2.4kHz bandwidth, which would 
> imply about -132dBm noise floor in 732Hz bandwidth, so some discrepancy there.
>
> On a crude practical level, if you listen to your 9kHz RX output and hear mostly crackling QRN, 
> that is fine... if you hear mostly 50Hz buzzing and other man-made noises, you either have a 
> problem with local noise being coupled to the preamp or receiver input, or need a better antenna 
> location... If you hear mainly "white noise", your receive system is probably deaf!
>
> Cheers, Jim Moritz
> 73 de M0BMU
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Markus Vester" <markusvester@aol.com>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 8:38 AM
> Subject: LF: Re: VLF 9 kcs: preamp and antenna noise
>
>
> Clemens,
>
> I believe what Jim was suggesting is a comparison of preamp noise output with the antenna 
> connected versus a passive load, rather than between different passive load impedances. The 
> intention is to demonstrate that the receiver noise contribution is neglegible against external 
> noise...
>