Envelope-to: dave@picks.force9.co.uk Delivery-date: Sat, 21 May 2005 14:28:24 +0100 Received: from ptb-spamcore01.plus.net ([192.168.71.1]) by pih-mxcore11.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DZU1g-0007K6-D9 for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 21 May 2005 14:28:24 +0100 Received: from Debian-exim by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.50) id 1DZU1f-0002vn-Sz for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 21 May 2005 14:28:24 +0100 Received: from [192.168.101.77] (helo=pih-mxcore11.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1DZU1f-0002vk-QE for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 21 May 2005 14:28:23 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by pih-mxcore11.plus.net with esmtp (PlusNet MXCore v1.0) id 1DZU1f-0007JR-JP for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sat, 21 May 2005 14:28:23 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1DZU1I-0003hf-2b for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 May 2005 14:28:00 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1DZU1H-0003hW-CO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 May 2005 14:27:59 +0100 Received: from smtp-out1.hurontel.on.ca ([216.46.129.246]) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DZU1F-0001gE-Qk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 21 May 2005 14:27:59 +0100 Received: from mail.hurontel.on.ca (mail.hurontel.on.ca [216.46.129.11]) by smtp-out1.hurontel.on.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4LDJcci020264 for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 09:19:38 -0400 Received: from server (dial-109.hurontel.on.ca [216.46.128.109]) by mail.hurontel.on.ca (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with SMTP id j4LDQ0Gt015928 for ; Sat, 21 May 2005 09:26:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <005201c55e00$e1f57ce0$8c802ed8@server> From: "J. B. Weazle McCreath" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000c01c55a6e$8d82f740$37d0fc3e@l8p8y6> <000d01c55b45$acb45e60$ac068351@w4o8m9> <002f01c55d97$09df4840$8c802ed8@server> <000901c55d99$bb7d7cf0$0700a8c0@Laptop> Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 13:18:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 216.46.129.246 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of hurontel.on.ca Subject: LF: Re: Re: Loop antenna problem Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v4.00s) Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
 Hello John, LF group,
 
Thanks for your reply.  The pickup loop is basically as you described, but with a
slight difference.  The feedline comes to the bottom of the loop where the shield
is exposed, then continues around the frame to complete one turn.  At the end,
both the inner conductor and the shield are connected to the exposed shield
where the feedline/loop transition is.  There is a half inch gap in the shield at
the top, directly opposite that connection, which stops the shield from being
seen as a shorted turn.  I'm told that another feature of doing it that way is
that it forms a built in balun.  I was striving for symetry.
 
Thanks & 73, J.B. Weazle McCreath, VE3EAR - VE3WZL
 
The clamps are in the wrong plane to present a short, so don't worry about that. Describe the connection of the feedline to the RG-213 link, please. I'm guessing that the coax feedline comes to the bottom, continues around to form the loop, and then the center conductor attaches to the feedline shield at the bottom, with no shield connection from the end. Sound right?