Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mj01.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mj01.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.21.164.85]) by air-de08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDE082-5ebf4d9b3c561e2; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:59:18 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mj01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 2754C38000210; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:59:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Q78cq-0002b3-Gu for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:57:04 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Q78co-0002au-Rj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:57:02 +0100 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Q78cl-0005dP-TU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2011 16:57:02 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvIAAEo6m01cEYjv/2dsb2JhbACCYJVBDo06d8NDhWwEgXuPHw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,305,1299456000"; d="scan'208,217";a="337660747" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.17.136.239]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 05 Apr 2011 16:56:52 +0100 Message-ID: <005101cbf3a1$ae044230$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: ,<4D999DB9.6070809@talktalk.net> ,<4D99CF9A.5080605@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> ,<4D9A33E8.70106@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <4D9AE24F.7040804@talktalk.net> <4D9B268F.40805@rtv5.cz> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:56:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: Re: Carrier Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004E_01CBF3AA.0F694C20" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039400c89a24d9b3c501fac X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CBF3AA.0F694C20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Text zpr=E1vyHi Lubos Having had a QSO with you on 137 and 500 khz I am looking for you on= 9 khz also to have a QSO. Let me know when you are ready and when I= get a valid ID we can try 9 khz ur end and my end 137 or 500 which ev= er suits you. I am not QRV TX on 9 khz at present. 73 and gl de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Lubomir Bobalik=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 3:26 PM Subject: LF: Carrier It had to really wonderful, Eddie!=20 No, this carrier was not me. If I am going to transmit, I will let= it know.=20 73! Lubos *******************************=20 Dne 5.4.2011 11:35, qrss napsal(a):=20 Hi Lubos That chimney sounds wonderful, it reminds me of some superb Top Ba= nd signals using Works QTH chimneys for antenna support, many years ag= o. Did you run your TX last night around 20.00UTC a strong carrier wa= s seen here and on EU Grabbers on your frequency. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 05/04/2011 09:53, Lubos OK2BVG wrote:=20 Hello Stefan!=20 You are right, I would like to see your VLF DFCW-3 signal again. As for my plans ... I will have to find out more better QTH for= transmission. There is lots of as high as my antenna hight buildings= around my QTH here. I am sure, it decrease its ERP significantly.= If I have more better TX QTH, than I will can think about increase= my power from 120W to ???W. There is old factory near my QTH. I dis= cussed with the director about using a high factory chimney for my VFL= purposes. I am waiting for his answer. It is half to half. 73! Lubos, OK2BVG=20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:11:04 +0200 From: schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: OK2BVG-DK7FC Hello Lubos,=20 Am 04.04.2011 19:20, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG: I hope to see your signal soon. I built a new modification of= your VLF active antenna, so it would be the good opportunity for test= ing this one. But for test purposes it is better to have a weak signal, just= above the noise ;-) But i know you are monitoring in DFCW-3... So, what do you plan next Lubos? QRO to 500 W? This would allow= you to produce a signal visible in TF i think. And you will be visibl= e in even worse conds. Or your signal will be visible during the night= period which allows you to send a full callsign or such funny things= ;-) Any plans? 73, Stefan 73! Lubos, OK2BVG ----------------------------------------------------------------------= -- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:03:06 +0200 From: schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: OK2BVG-DK7FC Hello Lubos,=20 Congratulations! This is your first clear trace on my grabber= in 6000 / 424 uHz. First i thought it is OE5ODL but there is no trace= on his grabber but a strong trace on OE3GHBs grabber. And if you are= sure about the TX frequency, it must be your signal. Very fine, 600= km ( http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=3DJN49IK&from=3Djn88ks ), my= first OK RX contact :-) Best 73 and QRO ;-) Stefan/DK7FC PS: Maybe we can have a "K" now once again? It is a better ID= than a long dash... Am 04.04.2011 13:49, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:=20 Hello Eddie! It would be my signal. We will see, but it seems to be promi= ssing! The conditions are good, so I will transmit until 12:00UT.= =20 My PC is disciplined by WaG generator PS30 (10kHz). See my= signal on the Stefan=B4s grabber in DFCW6000 window.=20 The frequency is correct: 8970.034Hz My new PA 120W running on its full power. It is doing its be= st :-) ! 73! Lubos, OK2BVG ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:30:17 +0100 From: qrss@talktalk.net To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: 110404_OK2BVG Hi Lubos I am pretty sure we have here. I make your frequency 8.97003= 4kHz. We will not get excited yet :-)=20 How stable is your signal, it seems possibly not stable enou= gh for QRSS 60000 to help. Continued operation after 11.00 UTC would help identificatio= n. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 03/04/2011 20:32, Lubos OK2BVG wrote:=20 Hello OMs!=20 I will be testing my VLF PA 120W tomorrow: Date: 04.04.2011 Time: 07:00 UT - 11:00 UT Antenna: Marconi L 24m up + 220m top load=20 PA: 120W =20 Identification: long carrier only Mode:=20 FRQ: 8970.040 (+/- some few mHz :-) Shift:=20 I hope, the conditions will be good :-) 73! Lubos, OK2BVG =20 ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CBF3AA.0F694C20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Text zpr=E1vy
Hi Lubos
Having had a QSO with you on 137 and 500 khz= I am looking=20 for you on 9 khz also to have a QSO. Let me know when you are ready an= d when I=20 get a valid ID we can try 9 khz ur end and my end 137 or 500 which eve= r suits=20 you.
I am not QRV TX on 9 khz at present.
73 and gl de mal/g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011= 3:26=20 PM
Subject: LF: Carrier

It had to really  wonderful, Eddie!

No,= this=20 carrier was not me. If  I am going to transmit, I will let it= know.=20

73!

Lubos

*******************************=20


Dne 5.4.2011 11:35, qrss napsal(a):=20
H= i=20 Lubos

That chimney sounds wonderful, it reminds me of some= superb Top=20 Band signals using Works QTH chimneys for antenna support, many ye= ars=20 ago.

Did you run your TX last night around 20.00UTC a stron= g carrier=20 was seen here and on EU Grabbers on your frequency.

73 Eddi= e=20 G3ZJO

On 05/04/2011 09:53, Lubos OK2BVG wrote:=20
Hello Stefan!=20
You are right, I would like to see your VLF DFCW-3 signal= again3D"Vesel=FD.

As for my plans ... I will have to find  out more bett= er QTH for=20 transmission. There is lots of as high as my antenna hight  = ;buildings=20 around my QTH here. I am sure, it  decrease  its  = ;ERP=20 significantly.  If I have more better  TX QTH, than I= will can=20 think about increase my power from 120W to ???W.  There is= old=20  factory near my QTH. I discussed with the director about= using a=20 high factory chimney for my VFL purposes.  I am waiting for= his=20 answer. It is half  to half.

73!

Lubos, OK2BVG 

Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 23:11:04 +0200
From: schaefer@iup.uni-heidelb= erg.de
To: = rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re:=20 LF: OK2BVG-DK7FC

Hello Lubo= s,

Am=20 04.04.2011 19:20, schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:

I hope to see your signal soon. I built a new modificatio= n of your=20 VLF active antenna, so it would be the good opportunity for te= sting this=20 one.
But for test purposes it is better to= have a weak=20 signal, just above the noise ;-) But i know you are monitoring= in=20 DFCW-3...

So, what do you plan next Lubos? QRO to 500 W?= This would=20 allow you to produce a signal visible in TF i think. And you wil= l be=20 visible in even worse conds. Or your signal will be visible duri= ng the=20 night period which allows you to send a full callsign or such fu= nny things=20 ;-) Any plans?

73, Stefan



73!

Lubos, OK2BVG

Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:03:06 +0200
From: schaefer@iup.un= i-heidelberg.de
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subjec= t: LF:=20 OK2BVG-DK7FC

Hello Lubos,

Congratulations! This= is your=20 first clear trace on my grabber in 6000 / 424 uHz. First i tho= ught it is=20 OE5ODL but there is no trace on his grabber but a strong trace= on=20 OE3GHBs grabber. And if you are sure about the TX frequency,= it must be=20 your signal. Very fine, 600 km ( http://no.nonsense.ee/qthmap/?qth=3DJN49IK&from=3Djn88ks= =20 ), my first OK RX contact :-)

Best 73 and QRO=20 ;-)

Stefan/DK7FC

PS: Maybe we can have a "K" now= once=20 again? It is a better ID than a long dash...

Am 04.04.2= 011 13:49,=20 schrieb Lubos OK2BVG:=20
Hello Eddie!
It would be my signal. We will see, but it= seems to be=20 promissing!
The conditions are good, so I will transmit= until=20 12:00UT.
My PC is disciplined by WaG generator PS30 (10k= Hz). See=20 my signal on the Stefan=B4s grabber in DFCW6000 window.
= The=20 frequency is correct: 8970.034Hz
My new PA 120W running= on its full=20 power. It is doing its best <= SPAN>:-)=20 !

73!

Lubos, OK2BVG


<= BR>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:30:17 +0100
From: qrss@talktalk.net
To:= rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject:=20 Re: LF: 110404_OK2BVG

Hi Lubos

I am pretty sur= e we have=20 here. I make your frequency 8.970034kHz. We will not get exc= ited=20 yet :-) <= BR>
How=20 stable is your signal, it seems possibly not stable enough= for QRSS=20 60000 to help.

Continued operation after 11.00 UTC wo= uld help=20 identification.

73 Eddie G3ZJO


On 03/04/20= 11 20:32,=20 Lubos OK2BVG wrote:=20
H= ello OMs!=20
I will= be testing=20 my VLF PA 120W tomorrow:

Date:=20 04.04.2011
Time: 07:00 UT -=20 11:00 UT
Antenna: Marconi L 24m up + 220m top= =20 load 
PA: 120W=20  
Identification: long carrier only
Mode:=20
FRQ: 8970.040=20 (+/- some few mHz :-)
Shift:=20


I hope= , the=20 conditions will be good :-)

73!

Lubos,= OK2BVG=20   



<= /HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01CBF3AA.0F694C20--