Return-Path: Received: (qmail 65085 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2005 18:15:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore02.plus.net) (192.168.71.3) by ptb-mailstore04.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Feb 2005 18:15:20 -0000 Received: from mailnull by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with spamcore-l-b (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D5SyK-000J0D-Qe for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:16:53 +0000 Received: from [192.168.67.1] (helo=ptb-mxcore01.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore02.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1D5SyK-000Izy-Dc for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:16:52 +0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1D5Syq-0001Lq-8h for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:17:24 +0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1D5SwJ-0005Nh-O3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:14:47 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1D5SwI-0005Mh-Bq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:14:46 +0000 Received: from smtpout19.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.19] helo=mta13-winn.mailhost.ntl.com) by relay.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D5SwG-0003lv-Qs for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:14:46 +0000 Received: from aamta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8]) by mta13-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20050227181439.QJVJ11211.mta13-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@aamta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com> for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:14:39 +0000 Received: from p2300 ([80.1.84.110]) by aamta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with SMTP id <20050227181438.DDNJ769.aamta05-winn.mailhost.ntl.com@p2300> for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:14:38 +0000 Message-ID: <005001c51cf8$524d6c40$10b80150@p2300> From: "captbrian" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <200502271724500058.0418698B@mail.zetnet.co.uk> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:15:29 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-SPF-Result: relay.thorcom.net: 212.250.162.19 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ukonline.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=failed,none Subject: LF: Re: Locator program Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) If you want to communicate with navigators in general and not just radio-hams then , then Lat. Long. seems obvious in view of universal GPS users Bryan ----- Original Message ----- From: John Rabson To: Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 5:24 PM Subject: LF: Locator program Over the years I have encountered a number of locator systems: Latitude and longitude GB national grid references QRA locator QTH locator Georef Maidenhead I am planning some HF propagation experiments from underground and need to know which locator I should be using for indicating my location in the UK. If the answer is not NGR I would want to feed the latter into a computer program. Suggestions, please? Regards, John Rabson G3PAI