Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mc01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B933638000154; Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:27:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TTsus-0005nu-F6 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:26:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TTsur-0005nl-T8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:26:29 +0000 Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.59.228]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TTsup-0005A8-U8 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:26:28 +0000 Received: from omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.52]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id JAon1k00417dt5G5FBT0q1; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:27:00 +0000 Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9]) by omta13.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id JBTR1k00A0CFS1j3ZBTRpD; Thu, 01 Nov 2012 11:27:25 +0000 Message-ID: <004f01cdb823$babe1d00$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> From: To: References: <2DB8CD9825714A6FBB66EB3CA667ACF9@White> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 07:26:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam-Score: 2.3 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Markus, Joe & JT9 entusiasts Finally got my first "15P6715P67WCV" decode last night after quite a few hours of JT9 operation over the past week. It appeared while running tests with WSPR and JT9 operating simultaneously. Because of the disparity between input signal levels between WSPR and JT9 the signal strength in JT9 was about 55 on the green scale. There was also a - 25dB WSPR signal in the passband at the time but I don't believe that was a factor. Backing down the audio input to the JT9 decoder eliminated the false decode. It would appear that "15P6715P67WCV" is related to strong signal input to the detector - either background noise/static or actual signals. [...] Content analysis details: (2.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [76.96.59.228 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.7 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 2.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D X-Scan-Signature: 24b65a258fa7a3a87cfdaa03bb2f3176 Subject: LF: Re: JT9 yesterday evening Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004B_01CDB802.335B76D0" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604950925c8f2eb1 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CDB802.335B76D0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Markus, Joe & JT9 entusiasts Finally got my first "15P6715P67WCV" decode last night after quite a few hours of JT9 operation over the past week. It appeared while running tests with WSPR and JT9 operating simultaneously. Because of the disparity between input signal levels between WSPR and JT9 the signal strength in JT9 was about 55 on the green scale. There was also a - 25dB WSPR signal in the passband at the time but I don't believe that was a factor. Backing down the audio input to the JT9 decoder eliminated the false decode. It would appear that "15P6715P67WCV" is related to strong signal input to the detector - either background noise/static or actual signals. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 ----- Original Message ----- From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 6:24 AM Subject: LF: JT9 yesterday evening Three times "DK7FC JN49QRP" decoded in JT9-2, and a couple of "DK7FC JN49IK" in five minute mode with +9 dB SNR. But our well known friend "15P6715P67WCV" appeared many times throughout the night... Best 73, Markus (DF6NM) ------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CDB802.335B76D0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Markus, Joe & JT9 = entusiasts
 
Finally got my = first "15P6715P67WCV" decode=20 last night after quite a few hours of JT9 operation over the past week. = It=20 appeared while running tests with WSPR and JT9 operating = simultaneously.=20 Because of the disparity between input signal levels between WSPR and = JT9=20 the signal strength in JT9 was about 55 on the green scale. There = was also=20 a - 25dB WSPR signal in the passband at the time but I don't believe = that was a=20 factor. Backing down the audio input to the JT9 decoder eliminated = the=20 false decode. It would appear that "15P6715P67WCV" is related = to=20 strong signal input to the detector - either background noise/static or = actual=20 signals.    
 
Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  = WE2XGR/2
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Markus=20 Vester
Sent: Thursday, November 01, = 2012 6:24=20 AM
Subject: LF: JT9 yesterday = evening

Three times "DK7FC JN49QRP" decoded = in JT9-2, and=20 a couple of "DK7FC JN49IK" in five minute mode with +9 dB=20 SNR. But our well known friend "15P6715P67WCV" appeared many = times=20 throughout the night...
 
Best 73,
Markus (DF6NM)
 
------=_NextPart_000_004B_01CDB802.335B76D0--