Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.74]) by air-di01.mail.aol.com (v127_r1.1) with ESMTP id MAILINDI014-eab94b9e91415c; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:57:53 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mtain-mc02.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 8256C380000B1; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 15:57:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1NrGPF-0007RI-JD for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:53 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1NrGPF-0007R9-7l for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:53 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NrGPD-0005YO-96 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:53 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4IADIunktOkzgb/2dsb2JhbACDDIRJkxdzqXSPY4Eygl9qBA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,645,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="294827772" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([78.147.56.27]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 15 Mar 2010 19:56:40 +0000 Message-ID: <004d01cac479$9fefcbe0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <000a01cac139$b9d5e5a0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <9D7C2F9B306347BEA848AC1560D1162B@JimPC> <4B995D52.6000802@abelian.org> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B54@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <38A51B74B884D74083D7950AD0DD85E82A1B56@File-Server-HST.hst.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de> <4B9E5289.1010505@abelian.org> <9afca2641003150842g6d571d1bx30352cbf1f28113@mail.gmail.com> <4B9E60F3.7020302@abelian.org> <4B9E6C02.8050504@freenet.de> <4B9E70FD.1070209@abelian.org> <8CC9280070BDA19-4A88-4FE@webmail-m005.sysops.aol.com> <4B9E8E3C.2030002@abelian.org> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:56:38 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.1 required=5.0 tests=MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d604a4b9e913f1185 X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 It is important for ID that the TX was keyed otherwise it could be any carrier. Positive ID is needed otherwise the experiment is meaningless de G3KEV ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Nicholson" To: Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 7:45 PM Subject: Re: LF: DK7FC's 2nd VLF TX test... > Markus wrote: > > He mentioned he had been attempting QRSS 10 for DF8ZR up > > to about 16:30, > > The signal was strongest up to 15:00, very narrow bandwidth too. > > Then there was a gap until about 15:20 or so, when the signal > came back weaker and with some spread until just after 16:00. > > It is important to know if the tx was CW or keyed during those > times. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- >