Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-de01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D6DDD3800008E; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 16:21:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TKarw-0000oF-Om for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:21:04 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TKarw-0000o6-70 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:21:04 +0100 Received: from authsmtp08.register.it ([81.88.48.58] helo=authsmtp.register.it) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TKart-0000KC-7o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:21:03 +0100 Received: (qmail 30561 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2012 20:20:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO netlab) (smtp@netlabitalia.it@77.43.115.57) by authsmtp.register.it with ESMTPA; 6 Oct 2012 20:20:59 -0000 From: "IZ2JGB Giorgio Barinetti" To: Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 22:20:04 +0200 Message-ID: <004b01cda3ff$f8ecd130$eac67390$@it> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac2j//hi2NiI0LHLTkS5Ku3ac2FRJA== Content-Language: it X-HELO-Warning: Remote host 81.88.48.58 (authsmtp08.register.it) used invalid HELO/EHLO authsmtp.register.it - verification failed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello to all The group. In those days i'm planning a remote Grabber to be placed in Milano. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [81.88.48.58 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: e43fe7093e9b3ae0dc118eec4efba8a5 Subject: LF: Remote Grabber Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004C_01CDA410.BC75A130" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d40c9507092e61038 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01CDA410.BC75A130 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello to all The group. In those days i'm planning a remote Grabber to be placed in Milano. The former IQ2MI site cannot be used due to the presence of The actual beacon, so i've got a choice of another Site. http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torre_Branca A nice 108 mt high iron tower near the center Of Milano. Apart of the IP connectivity , pc hardware and so on, which antenna do you suggest to use ? Thanks, Giorgio ------=_NextPart_000_004C_01CDA410.BC75A130 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello to all The group.

In those days i'm planning a = remote

Grabber to be placed in Milano.

The former IQ2MI site cannot be = used due to the presence of The actual beacon, so i've got a choice of = another

Site.

http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torre_Branca

A nice 108 mt high iron tower near the = center

Of Milano.

Apart of the IP connectivity , pc hardware and so = on,

which = antenna do you suggest to use ?

Thanks,

Giorgio

------=_NextPart_000_004C_01CDA410.BC75A130--