Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
X-Spam-DCC: paranoid 1233; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on lipkowski.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,
	HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=3.1.3
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by paranoid.lipkowski.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t51A3o65005063
	for <sq5bpf@lipkowski.org>; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 12:03:51 +0200
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1YzMVv-0006mY-6i
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:00:11 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1YzMVu-0006mP-OV
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:00:10 +0100
Received: from rgout0305.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.211])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.85)
	(envelope-from <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>)
	id 1YzMVr-0006Kl-1j
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 11:00:09 +0100
X-DKIM-Result: Domain=btopenworld.com Result=Signature OK
X-OWM-Source-IP: 81.153.68.195(GB)
X-OWM-Env-Sender: ganymede444@btinternet.com
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A090201.556C2D25.0009,ss=1,re=0.000,recu=0.000,reip=0.000,cl=1,cld=1,fgs=0
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=28/50,refid=2.7.2:2015.5.24.64817:17:28.905,ip=81.153.68.195,rules=__HAS_MSGID,
 __OUTLOOK_MSGID_1, __SANE_MSGID, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __HAS_REPLYTO,
 __HAS_FROM, FROM_NAME_ALLCAPS, FROM_NAME_ONE_WORD, __TO_MALFORMED_2,
 __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ,
 __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT,
 __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART,
 __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE,
 __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ADDY,
 __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_ACC, __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM,
 __REPLYTO_SAMEAS_FROM_DOMAIN, __ANY_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL,
 __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __STOCK_PHRASE_7, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, SUPERLONG_LINE,
 __HAS_HTML, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_HTML,
 __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3, __RATWARE_SIGNATURE_3_N1,
 RDNS_GENERIC_POOLED, __URI_NS, SXL_IP_DYNAMIC[195.68.153.81.fur],
 RDNS_SUSP_GENERIC, __OUTLOOK_MUA, RDNS_SUSP, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, REFERENCES
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
Received: from user8e280af712 (81.153.68.195) by rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (8.6.122.06) (authenticated as ganymede444)
        id 55606D3D01377637 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:00:04 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btopenworld.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1433152807; 
        bh=7SlPeY+mKLDCLGXpWRjBi08+92poiQTxWRBaBFwvTPE=;
        h=Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer;
        b=BTBy9McnDhUz2T78HdsrnurD+ibU/zklimHYYnkKfyFQV47aIrBbwD6VY4vVjQO/W4RunOY90VyJQALDIVGrIqvv37a9iPnYjyosKGyVskQco2so0fXCayBhM7bmhuBm7y2cXlAPaypWYlxuBXdsQVa1e7GEBHF2xbjlL+nKhkk=
Message-ID: <004901d09c51$bb30dc90$4201a8c0@user8e280af712>
From: "G3WCB" <ganymede444@btopenworld.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <CADxXMjd0qdcV0+BiGFszX2yRg_ihBGqx8MRZ-0JP_v007KykbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 11:00:02 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150531-1, 05/31/2015), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Scan-Signature: 070d9ab39265047b7fb462cd62854f10
Subject: LF: Re: Top loaded vertical spiral antenne
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0046_01D09C5A.1C1F56F0"
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 10.1.3.10
Status: O
X-Status: 
X-Keywords:                  
X-UID: 3393

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0046_01D09C5A.1C1F56F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello, Marcel.

Gary, G4WGT has done some experiments with this sort of spiral top-load =
antenna on 136 kHz. Take a look at his web-site, page 6. See link below.

http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/LF%20&%20MF%20Experiments%206.html

I have done a comparison with WSPR on 630m between my "standard" wire MF =
antenna and a short base-loaded vertical (not spiral wound) with a =
capacity hat. The standard antenna was a 20m long (tee) configuration =
with a horizontal section at 6m height and two topwires. The antenna had =
a vertical centre feed wire, with a loading coil in a shed under the mid =
point. The vertical section of the antenna is the only part that =
radiates. This antenna had a capacity of about 220 pF

The vertical antenna was a 5m fibreglass fishing rod with a capacity hat =
made from six 60cm long radials (wire coathangers!), with a loading coil =
inside the garage about 2m up from the bottom. I didn't measure the =
capacity of this antenna but I would expect it to be about 80 -100 pF.

I found that running the same RF power (15W) to the vertical produced =
WSPR reports that were about 10 dB weaker than the "standard" MF "tee" =
antenna. This performance could be improved by simply running 10dB more =
power to the vertical antenna! I would imagine that a spiral wound =
antenna would have a perfomance that would be one or two dB better than =
a base-loaded vertical.

I didn't do any comparison of the two antennas on receive, as I used a =
separate 60cm square tuned loop for reception on 630m

There's a picture of the vertical antenna and loading coil on my QRZ.com =
page.

http://www.qrz.com/db/g3wcb

73, Dave G3WCB IO80DI


  ----- Original Message -----=20
  From: Marcel Bos=20
  To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
  Sent: Monday, June 01, 2015 10:11 AM
  Subject: LF: Top loaded vertical spiral antenne


  Members,


  My backyard is in the city 8 x 8 m.  My intention is to do some =
experiments on 472 khz.

  Ready: RX converter 0-500 khz 10 mhz osc. and K3, RX ant. pa0rdt whip =
and receiving loop


  TX: GW3UEP 100 watt, RF meter, and variometer 30 uh -600 uh


  Now i'm looking for a antenne. Found a article from Finnbar EI0CF and =
Alan G3NYK about the spiral toploaded vertical.


  Has any body tryed this antenne, is the original article availble.

  What is the distance between the wire's  of the spiral?

  Also talking about a double spiral?


  So who is gone help me out  ore has some better suggetions for a =
antenne in my backyard

  http://www.xeropage.co.uk/g3nyk/spiraltop.htm#aerials


  tnx in advanced=20


  Marcel

  PA9M



------=_NextPart_000_0046_01D09C5A.1C1F56F0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=EF=BB=BF<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dutf-8">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3132" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hello, Marcel.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Gary, G4WGT has done some experiments =
with this=20
sort of spiral top-load antenna on 136 kHz. Take a look at his web-site, =
page 6.=20
See link below.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/LF%20&amp;%20MF%20Experiments=
%206.html">http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/wgtaylor/LF%20&amp;%20MF%20Experime=
nts%206.html</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I have done a comparison with WSPR on =
630m between=20
my "standard" wire MF antenna and a short base-loaded vertical (not =
spiral=20
wound) with a capacity hat. The standard antenna was a 20m long (tee)=20
configuration with a horizontal section at 6m height and two =
topwires.&nbsp;The=20
antenna had a vertical&nbsp;centre feed wire, with a loading coil in a =
shed=20
under the mid point. The vertical section of the antenna is the only =
part that=20
radiates. This antenna had a capacity of about 220 pF</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>The vertical antenna was a 5m =
fibreglass fishing=20
rod with a capacity hat made from six 60cm long radials (wire =
coathangers!),=20
with a loading coil inside the garage about 2m up from the bottom. I =
didn't=20
measure the capacity of this antenna but I would expect it to be about =
80 -100=20
pF.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I found that running the same RF power=20
(15W)&nbsp;to the vertical produced WSPR reports that were about 10 dB =
weaker=20
than the "standard" MF "tee" antenna. This performance could be improved =
by=20
simply running 10dB more power to the vertical antenna! I would imagine =
that a=20
spiral wound antenna would have a perfomance that would be one or two dB =
better=20
than a base-loaded vertical.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I didn't do any comparison of the two =
antennas on=20
receive, as I used a separate 60cm square tuned loop for reception on=20
630m</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>There's a picture of the vertical =
antenna and=20
loading coil&nbsp;on my QRZ.com page.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><A=20
href=3D"http://www.qrz.com/db/g3wcb">http://www.qrz.com/db/g3wcb</A></FON=
T></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>73, Dave G3WCB IO80DI</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
  <DIV=20
  style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black"><B>From:</B>=20
  <A title=3Dpa9marcel@gmail.com =
href=3D"mailto:pa9marcel@gmail.com">Marcel Bos</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A =
title=3Drsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20
  =
href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=
</A>=20
  </DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, June 01, 2015 =
10:11=20
AM</DIV>
  <DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> LF: Top loaded =
vertical spiral=20
  antenne</DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV>
  <DIV dir=3Dltr>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>
  <DIV>Members,<BR><BR></DIV>My backyard is in the city 8 x 8 m.&nbsp; =
My=20
  intention is to do some experiments on 472 khz.<BR></DIV>Ready: RX =
converter=20
  0-500 khz 10 mhz osc. and K3, RX ant. pa0rdt whip and receiving=20
  loop<BR><BR></DIV>TX: GW3UEP 100 watt, RF meter, and variometer 30 uh =
-600=20
  uh<BR><BR></DIV>Now i'm looking for a antenne. Found a article from =
Finnbar=20
  EI0CF and Alan G3NYK about the spiral toploaded =
vertical.<BR><BR></DIV>Has any=20
  body tryed this antenne, is the original article =
availble.<BR></DIV>What is=20
  the distance between the wire's&nbsp; of the spiral?<BR></DIV>Also =
talking=20
  about a double spiral?<BR><BR></DIV>So who is gone help me out&nbsp; =
ore has=20
  some better suggetions for a antenne in my backyard<BR><BR><A=20
  =
href=3D"http://www.xeropage.co.uk/g3nyk/spiraltop.htm#aerials">http://www=
.xeropage.co.uk/g3nyk/spiraltop.htm#aerials</A><BR><BR></DIV>tnx=20
  in advanced <BR><BR></DIV>Marcel<BR></DIV>PA9M<BR>
  <DIV>
  <DIV><BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0046_01D09C5A.1C1F56F0--