Message-ID: <004901c0890f$4b9d7920$88ca28c3@ericadodd>
From: "g3ldo" <g3ldo@ukonline.co.uk>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <3A7246CB.FF3090A0@alg.demon.co.uk> <3A7322C1.A2927B65@usa.net> <3A73C58C.4B20F438@alg.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: LF: This and that
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 09:45:20 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Steve

> Most recently, it has become common practice by QRSS operators
> such as G3LDO to further erode the number of notional CW channels
> by operating high power QRSS within the CW segment.  Over the
> past month I have heard QRSS for long periods on 136.5 and
> 136.3.  G3LDO has also admitted to operating QRSS on 136.5 and
> 136.4.  Last year we also heard QRSS on 137.0 and 137.1 kHz.

I have only operated in the QRSS in the CW section of the band twice in
several years of working on LF. Your e-mail implies that it is my "common
practice". The first time I was 200Hz away from the frequency where you were
calling CQ and the second time there was no CW activity at all. In both
cases there was a reason for doing so, which I have already explained on
e-mail.

I find being repeatedly flamed in e-mail a disturbing and depressing
experiance. I have never known anything like this in over 40 years of ham
radio.
Please stop it.


Peter, G3LDO

<g3ldo@ukonline.co.uk>