From: "Joe Proemper" <df2jp@gmx.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <E1eidmB-0005sH-1z@post.thorcom.com> <473da6a1-0b7d-1af6-5d0c-355b1c7bfe81@n1bug.com> <1E6A4083-58B4-455A-BEA5-64084858FF69@talktalk.net> <edfee178-0424-faf0-7f49-0978943b32db@n1bug.com> <1517845014772.54341@kuleuven.be> <cd7f524e-d953-4f58-cfff-5aba74d902ae@n1bug.com> <809882652.20180205161611@gmail.com> <1517848469797.2746@kuleuven.be> <797250428.20180205164428@gmail.com> <ceb9f3a3-4698-1f6b-4019-65fee4006da9@n1bug.com> <1178094692.20180205174213@gmail.com> <A1DD6320F39F409ABE32063233142981@mal>
In-Reply-To: <A1DD6320F39F409ABE32063233142981@mal>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:37:19 +0100
Message-ID: <004701d39eb0$5b2ec1e0$118c45a0$@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Thread-Index: AQEZWXSvSUoqKtsAmXyVndow8NG3BQH58VieArUhDxIB0ZUkagJni+4yAd3fujYCGwxj4gIA1+xCAfEdu18CVCN01QJUMFY0AXkuTvCkUwj3sA==
Content-Language: de
Subject: LF: AW: Re: MF/630M BAND
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Is there any reason to run your FT8 QSOs in the middle of WSPR area?

73 Joe

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] Im Auftrag von
g3kevmal@talktalk.net
Gesendet: Montag, 5. Februar 2018 19:21
An: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Betreff: LF: Re: MF/630M BAND

That  is why CW or QRSS is the preferred mode ie THE REAL DEAL-NO TOYS OR
GUESSWORK


G3KEV


-----Original Message----- 
From: Chris Wilson
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 5:42 PM
To: N1BUG
Cc: dead.fets@gmail.com
Subject: Re: LF: MF/630M BAND


Hello  Paul,  great  explanation, I understand now, these little black
box  "toys"  have their limitations :)   Thank you, sorry to doubt you
Rik!

Monday, February 5, 2018, 4:57:02 PM, you wrote:

> On 02/05/2018 11:44 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>
>> Hello Rik,
>>
>> Thanks, but hmmm, when I TX in JT-9 on LF N1BUG doesn't have spots
>> uploaded to PSK reporter site, although he receives me well. I asked
>> on the WSJT group and they said it wouldn't as no proper QSO was
>> completed.

> That is because the U3S cannot transmit a standard formatted CQ
> message. They may appear standard but they are not, they are sent as
> free text messages which WSJT-X does not recognize as a CQ, thus
> refuses to upload to PSK Reporter.

> Put another way, the WSJT-X software compresses CQ messages into a
> special format which the U3S does not do.

> Tonight we will all be using WSJT-X, thus our CQ messages should be
> properly encoded for recognition and upload to PSK Reporter at the
> receiving end.

> 73,
> Paul N1BUG FN55mf


-- 
Best regards,
Chris                            mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com