Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4404 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2001 07:10:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.services.quay.plus.net) (212.159.14.225) by excalibur-qfe1-smtp-plusnet.harl.plus.net with SMTP; 2 Oct 2001 07:10:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 8455 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2001 07:10:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by murphys with SMTP; 2 Oct 2001 07:10:24 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15oJUZ-0004t3-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2001 07:57:23 +0100 Received: from [195.119.180.43] (helo=email.seznam.cz) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15oJUX-0004sy-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2001 07:57:21 +0100 Received: (qmail 21760 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2001 06:56:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO OK1FIG) (195.47.69.2) by 195.119.180.43 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2001 06:56:32 -0000 Message-ID: <004701c14b0f$66ac6010$1601a8c0@cz.gmc.net> From: "Petr Maly \(OK1FIG\)" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Subject: LF: Re: Weekend activity Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2001 08:56:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi all There is an interesting info in this message for me. Jim says that Saturday morning was very noisy and Sunday was much quieter. Me (and I belive Rich too) have opposite experience. Saturday was quiet (and I made a lot of QSOs), it got much worse in the evening, QRN lasted all the Sunday morning and it got better Sunday afternoon. It looks as if the source of QRN moved accross Europe, from the west to the east. BTW, is the QRN same on the land and on the sea? If not, inland coutries like DL, OK, OM, HB9 are bit handicapped. 73 Petr OK1FIG ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Moritz" To: Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:43 PM Subject: LF: Weekend activity > Dear LF Group, > > Weekend activity here: > > On Friday night I was on 71.620k for testing, then some time after > midnight I changed to 71.924k until around 0400 to join G3AQC's > transatlantic beacon. > > Saturday morning was very noisy, and it got worse through the > day. Although there were lots of stations on, I could not copy much > DX under the QRN, although I did work EI0CF who was a strong > signal. I could see OM2TW's signal on the spectrogram screen, but > could not hear it at all. By the evening, I was struggling to copy > G8RW, who is quite local to me. > > On Saturday night I did some more antenna tests on 136.923k > around midnight. This was with about 250mW ERP, although I have > not worked out the figures in detail yet. This is probably what > CT1DRP's plots show, and what DF6NM saw. > > Sunday morning was much quieter, and I could hear OK1FIG call > CQ several times; I replied a number of times, but no QSO. > > On both days I could hear signals centred on about 137.4kHz, > which were a sort of "chirping", a bit like the strong signals just off > the bottom of the band. If they are a new signal on this frequency, > they must be quite distant, since they weren't much above the > noise. > > I have now got FS measurements on 73k as well as 136, and with > the antenna configured as an 8m high inv. L, or as an inverted V > jacked up to 17.5m in the center. I will post more details when I > have worked out the numbers. > > Cheers, Jim Moritz > 73 de M0BMU > >