Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-md04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id DACDA380000C5; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:33:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TinMj-0006dO-K3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:32:53 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TinMj-0006dF-3C for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:32:53 +0000 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TinMg-0006wU-T7 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:32:51 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlEJAM6UyFBcF/Ox/2dsb2JhbABFhjeELrQvF3OCGQUBAQQBCAEBAxYPASMCJgYBAQMFAgEDEQQBAQMCBSECAhQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYd6CqoPkwGBIospgRqCFoETA418mFWCcw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,266,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="412855902" Received: from host-92-23-243-177.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.243.177]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 12 Dec 2012 14:32:29 +0000 Message-ID: <004501cdd875$7feaf410$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50C78875.5050005@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <50C86B5F.40206@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 14:32:22 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: If you cannot hear them you cannot work them, a good RX is essential at all times. A large TX in BROADCAST or BEACON mode causes interference to others a GOOD RX DOES NOT A while back I was working an Italian stn on 500 Khz when an Amateur Beacon started up and almost wiped out the QSO. The Beacon Operator either had no RX on the frequency or did not check for acty before transmitting. This has happened several times, especially on MF I often can hear a number of stns calling CQ on MF normally German stns but they cannot hear each other but I can hear them all. I assume there is a RX problem. Alligators are not popular on Amateur Radio frequencies, especially the Beacon type [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: d7fcd9b75df8d1b09ddef9df028bd9ae Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=AMATEUR_PORN autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d605850c895c70c30 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none If you cannot hear them you cannot work them, a good RX is essential at all times. A large TX in BROADCAST or BEACON mode causes interference to others a GOOD RX DOES NOT A while back I was working an Italian stn on 500 Khz when an Amateur Beacon started up and almost wiped out the QSO. The Beacon Operator either had no RX on the frequency or did not check for acty before transmitting. This has happened several times, especially on MF I often can hear a number of stns calling CQ on MF normally German stns but they cannot hear each other but I can hear them all. I assume there is a RX problem. Alligators are not popular on Amateur Radio frequencies, especially the Beacon type de g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 11:32 AM Subject: Re: LF: HB9ASB Hi Toni, Am 12.12.2012 09:23, schrieb traumwandler@sensemail.ch: > [...]I'm sorry to say, but right now you are a big crocodile on the > band ;-) Why sorry? I like to be a crocodile. I have no problem about that :-) There is nothing negative about that. It is the same as having a good RX system and a poor TX system, which applies for much more of the stations available ;-) 73, Stefan > 73 de Toni > >> Preferred mode CW and SSB, no digital mode or similar computergames! >> No fake QSO’s!< > > > Am 11.12.2012 20:24, schrieb Stefan Schäfer: >> Toni, >> >> I guess that was you, answering to my call in CW? Sorry, i didn't >> listen to the band in that moment. The peak hold graph also indicates >> that the S/N was to low for CW reception. This must have to do with >> some new QRM in the background. The QRM interacts with the strength of >> HGA22. That's why expect that i will have much better LF reception >> with my new RX concept which is on the plan since a longer time. >> However i'm waiting for the mixer (SBL-3) from the US since several >> weeks. Hopefully soon... >> >> 73, Stefan/DK7FC