Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mg01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id CD52038000095; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:27:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TMMlQ-0003jZ-LF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:41:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TMMlQ-0003jQ-8s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:41:40 +0100 Received: from out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.237]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TMMlO-0007ie-LS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:41:39 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkIVAAIEd1BcF1bx/2dsb2JhbABEhhKELrQUAQJ8gQmCGwUBAQQBCAEBAxYzAhMTBgEBAwUCAQMRBAEBAwIFIQICFAEEGgYWCAYTCgECAgEBh20KpnSTCoEhiiZhgQKBHIIPgRIDjWmYNIJt X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,573,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="406368059" Received: from host-92-23-86-241.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.86.241]) by out1.ip01ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 11 Oct 2012 18:41:36 +0100 Message-ID: <004501cda7d7$a96f8e00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <50769C8B.10907@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> <5076F444.4030609@xs4all.nl> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 17:41:36 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 4.4 (++++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Albert This is what I suggested, ajustable attenuation and a good Receiver and Experienced and expert Radio Operators de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Albert W" To: Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 4:31 PM Subject: Re: LF: QSP from DK7PE: 2nd DK0SWF Activity October 13/14, 2012 [...] Content analysis details: (4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 4.4 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: e90dcb17768c7e768f13e0721cc1c0c7 Subject: Re: LF: QSP from DK7PE: 2nd DK0SWF Activity October 13/14, 2012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60c950770f83172e X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Albert This is what I suggested, ajustable attenuation and a good Receiver and Experienced and expert Radio Operators de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Albert W" To: Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 4:31 PM Subject: Re: LF: QSP from DK7PE: 2nd DK0SWF Activity October 13/14, 2012 > Hi Holger, > > When using the (large) TX-antenna during reception, it may be useful to > add a adjustable attenuator (0 - 50 dB) between the antenna and the > filter/EK070. > > 73, Albert PA0A > >