From: "John W Gould" <jwgould@iee.org>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Cc: "'Paul-Henrik'" <phl@netikka.fi>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 18:45:51 +0100
Message-ID: <004301c8fbda$1e031560$ae124452@acer5gi5q0ubzj>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1218315089.489e035101e18@imp.netikka.net>
Importance: Normal
Thread-Index: Acj6Ybg/3ueYCaFdTHyZ95riHT4/6ABdvZGQ
Subject: RE: LF: CEPT: Common Frequency Allocations Table
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


Paul-Hendrik,

I don't send the RSGB response, but looking at the ERO website (www.ero.dk -
follow link to "active consultations") it looks like it should be e-mailed
to yurdal@ero.dk=20

Changing the wording slightly will make it look less contrived, Hi!

Hope that this helps

73 John, G3WKL

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Paul-Henrik [mailto:phl@netikka.fi]=20
>Sent: 09 August 2008 21:51
>To: jwgould@iee.org
>Subject: RE: LF: CEPT: Common Frequency Allocations Table
>
>
>Hello again John!
>
>Where did RSGB send their response? A quick solution for us=20
>(SRAL) is to do a copy/paste/replace job of relevant 500kHz=20
>parts in the RSGB response and file it to CEPT under our own=20
>flag. We are not sure where to send it so that it will be=20
>officially recognized and received. Can you help us a little on this?
>
>This is the only way we can push 600m forward at the moment=20
>here in Finland so it is a very welcome opportunity.
>
>Best regards
>
>Paul-Henrik Lindroos / OH1LSQ
>SRAL LF/MF manager
>
>
>
>Quoting John W Gould <jwgould@iee.org>:
>
>> Paul,
>>
>> Thanks for the update on the SARL position.
>>
>> A SARL response to the ECC Report 25 consultation would be helpful -=20
>> there are a few days left in which to do this!  We need to get more=20
>> National Societies focused on agenda item 1.23 at WRC11 and making a=20
>> stance with this report is a good starting point.
>>
>> 73 John, G3WKL
>>
>> >Hello John!
>> >
>> >This is just what we would need for the "500kHz" band here in=20
>> >Finland. I have forwarded your mail to all concerned members in the=20
>> >SRAL workgroup for frequency matters. I'm not sure if there is=20
>> >anything more we can do at the moment because:
>> >
>> >We (SRAL) have already given our proposal regarding a 501-504kHz=20
>> >allocation to FICORA (our OFCOM) and it has been recognized=20
>by them.=20
>> >They see no problem with an allocation in Finland but want to see a=20
>> >CEPT desicion to go ahead. They refuse to bring up the subject=20
>> >themseves within CEPT but in the last meeting I attended with them,=20
>> >they promised to vote for any alike "500kHz" proposal if brought up=20
>> >by another party within CEPT.
>> >
>> >Best Regards
>> >
>> >Paul-Henrik Lindroos / OH1LSQ
>> >SRAL LF/MF manager
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>______________________________________________________________________
>This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security=20
>System. For more information please visit=20
>http://www.messagelabs.com/email=20
>______________________________________________________________________
>