X-GM-THRID: 1246948124430126130 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.86.2.20 with SMTP id 20cs35592fgb; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.250.9 with SMTP id x9mr1477259ugh.1189182400139; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m4si1619911ugc.2007.09.07.09.26.35; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) client-ip=193.82.116.20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) smtp.mail=owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ITgXm-0001sM-VS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:18:54 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ITgXm-0001sD-I0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:18:54 +0100 Received: from mk-filter-3-a-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.100.54] helo=mk-filter-3-a-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1ITgXj-000685-BX for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 17:18:54 +0100 X-Trace: 621123736-mk-filter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com-B2C-$THROTTLED-DYNAMIC-CUSTOMER-DYNAMIC-IP X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 88.106.127.219 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CANMW4UZYan/b/2dsb2JhbAA Received: from 88-106-127-219.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO wgt01) ([88.106.127.219]) by smtp.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 07 Sep 2007 17:18:45 +0100 Message-ID: <004301c7f16a$c361c360$db7f6a58@wgt01> From: "Gary - G4WGT" To: References: <46E15ABA.6439.17F59A3@localhost> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 17:18:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Spam-Score: -0.2 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,AWL=-0.246 Subject: LF: Re: [500 - QSB Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 35 Mike, There are some 500 KHz plots on Hartmut Wolff's capture page :- http://www.h-wolff.de/Latest500kHz.htm 73 Gary - G4WGT - IO83qp ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Dennison" To: Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 2:05 PM Subject: LF: [500 - QSB > Does anyone have a spectrogram screen shot of 500kHz signals showing > the QSB period and approximate depth? This could be CW or QRSS, but I > am especially interested in seeing how QRSS is affected by fading. An > estimate of the path lengths involved would also be helpful. > > This is for the new edition of LF Today. > > Thanks in advance. > > Mike, G3XDV > ========== > > > > >