Return-Path: Received: from rly-dd10.mx.aol.com (rly-dd10.mail.aol.com [172.19.141.157]) by air-dd10.mail.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDD101-ba147a0ae6719d; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:06:21 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dd10.mx.aol.com (v121.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDD103-ba147a0ae6719d; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:05:48 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1JKGMR-0004jn-PA for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:04:31 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1JKGMR-0004je-7o for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:04:31 +0000 Received: from mx1.netbanx.com ([217.33.219.138]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JKGML-0007XL-ID for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:04:31 +0000 Received: from mx1.netbanx.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.netbanx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71001A8001 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:04:16 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=netbanx.com; h=from:to: references:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type: in-reply-to; q=dns/txt; s=secure; bh=5vRey1cqEy7GqJXhEZhUVdPuPeE =; b=ZJ00Sfa7G7a5Fyq/663U5xsfoJ2Icc5YTj4PcZooSNTeL2kb4Zup8f70gvv IIMBFfGA8TwBA1uC+XevPQCCs7mwnlPWa5JNhmF0uMcUKzyyR7oqb1GQWexIDf0P PszUYvZhVP7TCUtn2i3VNeXKXiNi01jJgxLML0/nnVrOCajc= Received: from AndrewPoodle (unknown [192.168.5.48]) by mx1.netbanx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FB81A8001 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:04:12 +0000 (GMT) From: "Dominic Baines" To: References: <20080130163652.z830p3r8mqokc4o4@webmail4.kuleuven.be> <223644.10522.qm@web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:04:14 -0000 Message-ID: <004201c86362$242e7b70$3005a8c0@AndrewPoodle> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <223644.10522.qm@web28104.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AchjYU1OoWrNBfeSTTmbwtb9L0cQTgAAL/gQ X-NetBanx-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-NetBanx-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=-1.738, required 4.8, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_20 -0.74, DK_POLICY_TESTING 0.00, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, J_CHICKENPOX_13 0.80) X-NetBanx-MailScanner-From: dbaines@netbanx.com X-Karma: 0: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: RE: Feb 1st approaches ...600m ... SP? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0043_01C86362.242E7B70" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_60_70, HTML_FONTCOLOR_UNKNOWN,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_helo : n X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: listenair ; SPF_822_from : + X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d029.1 ; domain : netbanx.com DKIM = 3 ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C86362.242E7B70 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Peter, I asked this and John Gould said this: Dom, thanks for raising the issue of the NoV, as I guess others are keen to know where we all stand. RSGB, at its quarterly meeting with Ofcom last September, raised the issue of NoV extension, as well as requesting an increase of ERP. As you may recall several of the correspondents on this reflector provided me with some useful material for our case. Ofcom commented then that they would need to gain a view from the primary user, Maritime and Coastguard Agency, as well as wait until the outcome of WRC-07 was known. I view that as sensible, since apart from the small matter of RR5.83 that prohibited non-distress use of the band 495-505kHz, there was an WRC agenda item concerning maritime use of the spectrum in this area of interest. We had a further quarterly meeting with Ofcom last week and we were told that they would be making an announcement concerning the matter during the first half of February. There is nothing that individual NoV holders need to do apart from wait patiently! As far as your own NoV is concerned I suggest that you progress it again - I haven't seen the application. 73 John, G3WKL RSGB HF Manager g3wkl@btinternet.com 73 Dom _____ From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Peter March Sent: 30 January 2008 16:43 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: LF: Feb 1st approaches ...600m ... SP? Hi All Does any one know the fate of UK 600m ? Nothing on the RSGB News other than the ON killer Watts ;-) 73 Petefmt _____ Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good ------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C86362.242E7B70 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Peter,=

 =

I asked this and John Go= uld said this:

 =

Dom, t= hanks for raising the issue of the NoV, as I guess others are keen to know where we all stand.

&= nbsp;

RSGB,=20= at its quarterly meeting with Ofcom last September, raised the issue=

of NoV= extension, as well as requesting an increase of ERP.   As you may

recall= several of the correspondents on this reflector provided me with some useful material for o= ur case.  Ofcom commented then that they would need to gain a view from th= e primary user, Maritime and Coastguard Agency, as well as wait until the outc= ome of WRC-07 was known.  I view that as sensible, since apart from the sma= ll matter of RR5.83 that prohibited non-distress use of the band 495-505kHz, th= ere was an WRC agenda item concerning maritime use of the spectrum in this area=20= of interest.  We had a further quarterly meeting with Ofcom last week and=20= we were told that they would be making an announcement concerning the matter during=20= the first half of February. 

&= nbsp;

There=20= is nothing that individual NoV holders need to do apart from wait patiently!

&= nbsp;

As far= as your own NoV is concerned I suggest that you progress it again - I haven't seen the application. 

&= nbsp;

73 Joh= n, G3WKL

RSGB H= F Manager

&= nbsp;

g3wkl@= btinternet.com

&= nbsp;

 =

73

Dom

 =

From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Peter March
Sent: 30 January 2008 16:43 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: LF: Feb 1st approach= es ...600m ... SP?

 


Hi All

 

Does any one know the fate of UK 600m ? <= o:p>

 

Nothing on the RSGB News other than the ON killer Watts  ;-)

 

73 Petefmt

=  

Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with= Yahoo! for Good

------=_NextPart_000_0043_01C86362.242E7B70--