Return-Path: Received: from rly-me05.mx.aol.com (rly-me05.mail.aol.com [172.20.83.39]) by air-me08.mail.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILINME082-9b74a65e39a55; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:50:08 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-me05.mx.aol.com (v124.15) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINME053-9b74a65e39a55; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:49:48 -0400 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1MTHaH-0008T9-Pj for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:48:53 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1MTHaH-0008T0-C9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:48:53 +0100 Received: from ttsmtp-1.cpwnetworks.com ([62.24.128.242] helo=ttsmtp.cpwnetworks.com) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1MTHa0-0007Ah-OS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:48:37 +0100 X-Path: TalkTalk-smtp X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAIeAZUpcHCup/2dsb2JhbACEb84IhAwF Received: from unknown (HELO mal769a60aa920) ([92.28.43.169]) by ttsmtp.cpwnetworks.com with SMTP; 21 Jul 2009 16:48:44 +0100 Message-ID: <003f01ca0a1a$ba6fd880$0301a8c0@mal769a60aa920> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <20090721111004.NESLM.2165994.root@mp07> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:48:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Loop (was Re: IGBT in 136 KHz TX?) Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Use a vertical and avoid all the specified LOOP problems and directional limitations. Loops maybe for RX but for TX vertical systems, ie inv L, T top is probably the best approach on LF and MF. One wave loops on the frequency of interest on HF is a different story. mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 4:10 PM Subject: Re: LF: Loop (was Re: IGBT in 136 KHz TX?) > Just to add a little more information on LF transmitting loops: > > Paralleling conductors is usually more effective than creating a > multi-turn loop. The extra copper loss from another turn can easily negate > the increase in field strength from that turn. > > With paralleled conductors, keep them separated so that the current will > flow over the complete outer surface of each conductor. 10cm spacing seems > reasonable as a minimum. > > My experience is limited to a single-conductor loop, and 500 watts > transmitter output. I've had two experiences with tree fires. Both were > caused by my earlier method of running the lower leg of the loop through > PVC fittings at each tree. Long screws through the fittings provided sharp > edges to scrape insulation and increase the voltage gradient between the > screw and the wire. I have long since switched to porcelain insulators for > the lower supports, with no trouble. All other contacts with the trees are > directly between the wire and the tree. I do worry about a lot of > insulation damage done last winter during and after an ice storm, but thus > far there have been no issues. > > Major starting difficulties are the voltage and current ratings of tuning > capacitors and coupling transformers. Your senses of touch and smell will > help in knowing if you have succeeded! While the voltages and currents can > be accurately calculated in advance, you may have limited information on > the components, particularly the current rating of capacitors. In general, > think big. > > And just one random thought on multi-turn receiving loops: As Jim Moritz > has pointed out a number of times, a loop of N turns can be quite nicely > replaced by a loop of one turn and an N step-up transformer. A one-turn > loop is easier to construct, and may provide a wider tuning range. > > John, W1TAG > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.375 / Virus Database: 270.13.21/2252 - Release Date: 07/21/09 05:58:00