Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.222]) by air-da08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA083-86404d25b85e63; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:41:02 -0500
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D7A9738000118;
	Thu,  6 Jan 2011 07:40:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Pap8X-0006wq-8d
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:40:13 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1Pap8W-0006wh-Kw
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:40:12 +0000
Received: from nm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.250])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <alan.melia@btinternet.com>)
	id 1Pap8V-0003Z5-LY
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:40:12 +0000
Received: from [217.146.183.183] by nm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 12:40:06 -0000
Received: from [217.146.183.32] by tm14.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 12:40:06 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 12:40:06 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 333928.82276.bm@omp1021.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 68903 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 12:40:06 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
  h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status;
  b=up+T6eFVphgnVpR1ucufpShq6DQ2aYM+N+Dhh/Rpbo1hrKT128mjQVRgsG7xANtMFAuWI63cTbjTzFU0bFdNFLaKKN3Yv9CWMHg4kAeldD3HJ7BSnDOhlC3blXIoUIOKafXUK2Rgu+ZIfwJpsdMIFlemfw9b4i9Z/sQ2fVXNdSY=  ;
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1294317606; bh=82y6ieFvC6rugYccX5hm01e//5lTcCuWmheVTEqqT8Y=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Mt7RqXAF9IQvo0gmKcPmSFXlFuZD5lK16GSuwQTcKiqB7oILHiknubn2n6t5FgTJ6tXGUx06dTIEiyO5HGxDkWAEw7HzBkGr5W6nYhLGRECVAuJgXUiNdP37+9BPPWRjUVQiNPoFZyJGWOC05j3TZeqd4sZ9rHwuy/WVAWRUOOY=
Received: from lark (alan.melia@86.157.31.254 with login)
        by smtp817.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Jan 2011 12:40:02 +0000 GMT
X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E-
X-YMail-OSG: Zp1VM3sVM1n9OOzwbTp6QCrEE62u66lHchdkWdwUflg814Q
 iUPybggs9ZdPfSRbKaqFojUoP3Oq8pSE62McNlVZom6zwQCUwZEwLvoJ.aJl
 KYIDdZNZKn52xV8p9hDmU9thJaHyRcmeqzdS7i4Io8DHAYy0.yCUotjS2F_d
 E.oNoLuQKeUC2xnt.yJ6D4mAxBgx0Q3sT4bW7dzQj_YfwSZoejJHoTbZ0Tvi
 tsz_dfUQATMrNAfqM_QpZTadeQhKayIdbpAQ3NnFlqO9VO1xpXpOkvenwGd8
 KBG5VIcN64t7Ledf4ZIoZJOc2wxOO3RIq0vj1ogl9krs-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
Message-ID: <003e01cbad9e$d72f2420$4001a8c0@lark>
From: "Alan Melia" <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <AANLkTi=X5MOY5Pqmn7nq5h9BBhngAARZqCc3F4Zy__2u@mail.gmail.com><AANLkTim9b=9xD6KXhtzY89Mfyw2+ysFJJOYJHJJDK5Eq@mail.gmail.com><001c01cbad30$5ad3da60$4001a8c0@lark> <AANLkTindoqVRGVXuXtrtGweWBgiD7w48_eqpaNmx659M@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:40:01 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110106-0, 06/01/2011), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001
Subject: Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d012.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60de4d25b85b189f
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25


Hi Andy yes that makes sense.......Finbars measurements showed that the
situation recovered once (almost immediately) the rain stopped though the
ground was still wet......that shows a slightly different effect??  Finbars
tower is reasonably clear of "environment."

Alan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Talbot" <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening


> We put it down to an increase in lossy paralle resistance.
> In dry conditions, the reactive (out of phase) near field current
terminates
> on ground radials without passing through too much (relatively speaking)
> lossy ground material.
>
> When everything is covered in water, the reactive field is conducted away
> into lossy ground material before entering the radials.  Being resistive,
> the current moves into phase with the E-field and ,starts to introduce
added
> I^2R loss.  Most significantly here, walls and roof tiles the top-hat
passes
> close to become more conductive, extracting noticably in-phase currents
from
> the E field.
>
> The result is a *decreased* resistance in *parallel *with the antenna
> capacitance, and when you plug decreased parallel R into the equation for
> parallel-to-serial transform, voila, an *increased series* term.
>
> The tuning shifts marginally, but it was far worse when the effect was
first
> discovered on 73kHz.
> Was that really well over a decade ago - time flies!
>
> Andy
> www.g4jnt.com
>
>
>
> On 5 January 2011 23:28, Alan Melia <alan.melia@btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes that is what my aerial measurements said as well in
rain....increased
> > loss resistance.....not sure though whether it is a ground effect or the
> > film of water on the wire.
> >
> > Alan G3NYK
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andy Talbot" <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:33 PM
> > Subject: Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this
evening
> >
> >
> > > No - no changes at all.
> > >
> > > The only difference is that it is raining now.which - by the way these
> > > things work - has *increased* the antenna resistance and reduced power
> > > output by a dB or two.
> > >
> > > Andy
> > > 'JNT / 'IMR
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5 January 2011 14:53, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Andy,
> > > >
> > > > Your 136kHz WSPR beacon is coming in very well today at
around -6/-7dB
> > S/N
> > > > at 188km. Have you made some further ERP improvements?  PA0A is also
a
> > very
> > > > good signal too.
> > > >
> > > > I hope to be TXing on 136kHz WSPR this evening ....but with a rather
> > weaker
> > > > signal than these two. Any reports (at all) would be very much
> > appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > 73s
> > > > Roger G3XBM
> > > > --
> > > > g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
> > > > www.g3xbm.co.uk
> > > > www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
> > > > <http://vlf_grabber/>G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>