Return-Path: Received: from mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.222]) by air-da08.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDA083-86404d25b85e63; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 07:41:02 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh10.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id D7A9738000118; Thu, 6 Jan 2011 07:40:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Pap8X-0006wq-8d for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:40:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Pap8W-0006wh-Kw for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:40:12 +0000 Received: from nm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.146.182.250]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pap8V-0003Z5-LY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:40:12 +0000 Received: from [217.146.183.183] by nm9.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 12:40:06 -0000 Received: from [217.146.183.32] by tm14.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 12:40:06 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1021.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Jan 2011 12:40:06 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 333928.82276.bm@omp1021.mail.ukl.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 68903 invoked from network); 6 Jan 2011 12:40:06 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=up+T6eFVphgnVpR1ucufpShq6DQ2aYM+N+Dhh/Rpbo1hrKT128mjQVRgsG7xANtMFAuWI63cTbjTzFU0bFdNFLaKKN3Yv9CWMHg4kAeldD3HJ7BSnDOhlC3blXIoUIOKafXUK2Rgu+ZIfwJpsdMIFlemfw9b4i9Z/sQ2fVXNdSY= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1294317606; bh=82y6ieFvC6rugYccX5hm01e//5lTcCuWmheVTEqqT8Y=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Mt7RqXAF9IQvo0gmKcPmSFXlFuZD5lK16GSuwQTcKiqB7oILHiknubn2n6t5FgTJ6tXGUx06dTIEiyO5HGxDkWAEw7HzBkGr5W6nYhLGRECVAuJgXUiNdP37+9BPPWRjUVQiNPoFZyJGWOC05j3TZeqd4sZ9rHwuy/WVAWRUOOY= Received: from lark (alan.melia@86.157.31.254 with login) by smtp817.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 06 Jan 2011 12:40:02 +0000 GMT X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- X-YMail-OSG: Zp1VM3sVM1n9OOzwbTp6QCrEE62u66lHchdkWdwUflg814Q iUPybggs9ZdPfSRbKaqFojUoP3Oq8pSE62McNlVZom6zwQCUwZEwLvoJ.aJl KYIDdZNZKn52xV8p9hDmU9thJaHyRcmeqzdS7i4Io8DHAYy0.yCUotjS2F_d E.oNoLuQKeUC2xnt.yJ6D4mAxBgx0Q3sT4bW7dzQj_YfwSZoejJHoTbZ0Tvi tsz_dfUQATMrNAfqM_QpZTadeQhKayIdbpAQ3NnFlqO9VO1xpXpOkvenwGd8 KBG5VIcN64t7Ledf4ZIoZJOc2wxOO3RIq0vj1ogl9krs- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <003e01cbad9e$d72f2420$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <001c01cbad30$5ad3da60$4001a8c0@lark> Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 12:40:01 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 110106-0, 06/01/2011), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean DomainKey-Status: good (testing) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001 Subject: Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-d012.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : pass x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60de4d25b85b189f X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 Hi Andy yes that makes sense.......Finbars measurements showed that the situation recovered once (almost immediately) the rain stopped though the ground was still wet......that shows a slightly different effect?? Finbars tower is reasonably clear of "environment." Alan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andy Talbot" To: Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 8:57 AM Subject: Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening > We put it down to an increase in lossy paralle resistance. > In dry conditions, the reactive (out of phase) near field current terminates > on ground radials without passing through too much (relatively speaking) > lossy ground material. > > When everything is covered in water, the reactive field is conducted away > into lossy ground material before entering the radials. Being resistive, > the current moves into phase with the E-field and ,starts to introduce added > I^2R loss. Most significantly here, walls and roof tiles the top-hat passes > close to become more conductive, extracting noticably in-phase currents from > the E field. > > The result is a *decreased* resistance in *parallel *with the antenna > capacitance, and when you plug decreased parallel R into the equation for > parallel-to-serial transform, voila, an *increased series* term. > > The tuning shifts marginally, but it was far worse when the effect was first > discovered on 73kHz. > Was that really well over a decade ago - time flies! > > Andy > www.g4jnt.com > > > > On 5 January 2011 23:28, Alan Melia wrote: > > > Yes that is what my aerial measurements said as well in rain....increased > > loss resistance.....not sure though whether it is a ground effect or the > > film of water on the wire. > > > > Alan G3NYK > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andy Talbot" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 3:33 PM > > Subject: Re: LF: G8IMR - stronger? ...and G3XBM on 136kHz WSPR this evening > > > > > > > No - no changes at all. > > > > > > The only difference is that it is raining now.which - by the way these > > > things work - has *increased* the antenna resistance and reduced power > > > output by a dB or two. > > > > > > Andy > > > 'JNT / 'IMR > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5 January 2011 14:53, Roger Lapthorn wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Andy, > > > > > > > > Your 136kHz WSPR beacon is coming in very well today at around -6/-7dB > > S/N > > > > at 188km. Have you made some further ERP improvements? PA0A is also a > > very > > > > good signal too. > > > > > > > > I hope to be TXing on 136kHz WSPR this evening ....but with a rather > > weaker > > > > signal than these two. Any reports (at all) would be very much > > appreciated. > > > > > > > > 73s > > > > Roger G3XBM > > > > -- > > > > g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/ > > > > www.g3xbm.co.uk > > > > www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm > > > > G3XBM GQRP 1678 ISWL G11088 > > > > > > > > > > > > > >