Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94754 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2004 22:43:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ptb-spamcore01.plus.net) (192.168.71.1) by ptb-mailstore01.plus.net with SMTP; 12 Jul 2004 22:43:34 -0000 Received: from [192.168.67.3] (helo=ptb-mxcore03.plus.net) by ptb-spamcore01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1Bk9XC-000I6w-Ia for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:44:30 +0100 Received: from post.thorcom.com ([193.82.116.20]) by ptb-mxcore03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1Bk9WG-0003Mg-2w for dave@picks.force9.co.uk; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:43:32 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1Bk9Vw-0003ju-IF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:43:12 +0100 Received: from [193.82.116.30] (helo=relay.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1Bk9Vw-0003jl-6F for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:43:12 +0100 Received: from smtp804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.12.141]) by relay.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bk9Vs-0006UC-S5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:43:12 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO Main) (rsgb?lf?group@blacksheep.org@81.135.11.193 with poptime) by smtp804.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2004 22:43:02 -0000 Message-ID: <003e01c46861$a0b13160$6507a8c0@Main> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2004 23:43:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=no,RCVD_IN_SORBS=0.1 Subject: LF: Re receivers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Spam-Filtered: by PlusNet SpamCORE (v3.00) Hi Mike, I was "volunteered" by Pat G4GVW as I suggested the AOR 7030 to him, but I think you know my opinions on that well. Both ours are fitted with Rockell-Collins 300Hz filters. I generally dont find the noise blanker which is available on the "Plus" version useful on 136kHz. It could be I have the "Wrong kind of noise" (with apologies to BR, Railtrack, and whoever runs trains now) I have also used a Lowe HF150 to good effect, this tunes down to 30kHz. The problems are no RF gain control, no AGC OFF switch, no ability to electronically lock the tuning knob and only a 2.1kHz filter with no option to fit others, however the IDM performance is much better than rigs costing a lot more. I used it successfully in my early "SWL" (or should it be "LWL" !!) days with a good audio filter....probably before Jim became active!! He would cause havoc with the AGC here. I believe from Finbar that the Lowe HF225, which can be fitted with a narrow filter, is very good (and Finbar is a REAL operator, unlike me!) The Trio/Kenwood R1000 only really tunes down to 200kHz and rolls off rapidly below that. It is possible to feed a signal into a test-point after the RF octave filters, and disable the BC IF attenuator, but the performance is not good and it has no provision for IF CW filter, or AGC OFF. The noise blanker never seemed any good for anything except car ignition to me. Tuning resolution is 1kHz. I have used it with a converter but the FT101ZD with narrow filter was much better in that mode. I believe there are several Racal RA1792s around in use (Brian has a couple, and I think Andy uses one) I would like to be able to report on an AR88LF (I dont have one now) but I would have to go into weight-training first!! Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com