Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18250 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1999 23:36:26 +0100 Received: from magnus.plus.net.uk (HELO magnus.force9.net) (195.166.128.27) by guiness.force9.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 1999 23:36:26 +0100 Received: (qmail 6965 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1999 22:38:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by magnus.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 19 Jul 1999 22:38:30 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 116Lqo-0008KS-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 23:25:34 +0100 Received: from cask.force9.net ([195.166.128.29]) by post.thorcom.com with smtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 116Lqn-0008KN-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 19 Jul 1999 23:25:33 +0100 Received: (qmail 9353 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1999 22:25:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO caffreys.force9.net) (195.166.128.121) by cask.force9.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 1999 22:25:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 21764 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1999 22:26:16 -0000 Received: from mashie.force9.net (195.166.128.30) by caffreys.force9.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 1999 22:26:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 1275 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1999 22:25:20 -0000 Received: from caffreys.force9.net (195.166.128.121) by mashie.force9.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 1999 22:25:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 21761 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1999 22:26:14 -0000 Received: from mashie.force9.net (195.166.128.30) by caffreys.force9.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 1999 22:26:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 1272 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1999 22:25:19 -0000 Received: from mayfly.plus.net.uk (HELO mayfly.force9.net) (195.166.128.28) by mashie.force9.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 1999 22:25:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 22546 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1999 22:25:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO prstesv1) (212.56.95.41) by mayfly.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 19 Jul 1999 22:25:17 -0000 Message-ID: <003e01bed236$023a6180$0600a8c0@prstesv1.prestel.co.uk> From: "Dave" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Subject: Re: LF: Horizontal polarisation on LF? Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1999 23:28:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Sender: Dear all, The important thing about any LF antenna is to ensure that the wire is supported by good insulators, nothing kills the Q of a system like a wire touching a damp tree or similar lossy structure. I am sure a low wire will work, I have had good QSOs on 160 with my kite wire lying on the ground after the wind dropped, average height about half a metre! Please try it Rik! 73, Dave G3YXM > >The long wire straddles a deep gully, but the wire has considerable >sag. The wire is a thinner type of power line wire, as it needs to >survive strong wind conditions. Conventional wooden pole supports are >used, and height above ground is only 4 or 5 metres in places, but >obviously the route is strategically placed to get a good span of the >main gully. I have visited the farm site, but it is difficult to >describe the situation in a brief message. Thus the sagging wire, over >an irregular terrain gully, is fairly difficult to model with software. >But whether or not it is adequately modelled, ZL1WB has done very well >with log book entries and QSL cards. > >I think it is worth trying long wires in practice for LF transmitting, >and whether it breaks records for dummy loads or DX will soon be >apparent. Not many amateur sites have room for a very long wire. In >this respect, the ZL1WB long wire has a remote controlled transmitter, >as the "selected site" is a few kilometres from his QTH, at a farm >building with mains power. > >Regards, > >Bob ZL2CA > > >