Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-mh04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id E91423800018E; Fri, 9 Nov 2012 04:16:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1TWkg5-0000CZ-FW for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:15:05 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1TWkg4-0000CQ-Oh for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:15:04 +0000 Received: from out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.241]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1TWkg2-0001nI-QE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 09:15:03 +0000 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah8UAJTInFBcF/mT/2dsb2JhbABEike3fwEDf4EJghkFAQEFCAEBAyUBIwIsAQEDBQIBAxEEAQEKJRQBBBoGFggGEwoBAgIBAYd9vH6MElAcCCmCBoMlA410iSOPJ4Jv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,744,1344207600"; d="scan'208";a="399264823" Received: from host-92-23-249-147.as13285.net (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.23.249.147]) by out1.ip05ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 09 Nov 2012 09:15:01 +0000 Message-ID: <003d01cdbe5a$b25bff00$0501a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <509C1990.5000208@iup.uni-heidelberg.de> Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 09:15:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 3.8 (+++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Stefan I started up on 136.173.5 but noticed the JA grabber and the RN3 grabber were OFF so I went QRT. Condx were good both on LF es MF yesterday An opportunity missed but there will be another time also the YV grabber sensitivity looks too low for weak signal detection. [...] Content analysis details: (3.8 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 3.8 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_024C2 X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: LF: Re: DCF39 in Japan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60d8509cc9e14850 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Stefan I started up on 136.173.5 but noticed the JA grabber and the RN3 grabber were OFF so I went QRT. Condx were good both on LF es MF yesterday An opportunity missed but there will be another time also the YV grabber sensitivity looks too low for weak signal detection. de mal/g3kev ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Schäfer" To: Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 8:44 PM Subject: LF: DCF39 in Japan > ...is very strong, 30 dB S/N at JA8SCD, http://icas.to/argo/eu.htm but > JA7NI does not run the grabber. A pity! > > 73, Stefan/DK7FC >