Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-ma01.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 9202D3800008F; Thu, 3 May 2012 08:11:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1SPurO-0005nD-FZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 13:10:14 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1SPurN-0005n4-QH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 13:10:13 +0100 Received: from nm2.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com ([77.238.189.59]) by relay1.thorcom.net with smtp (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1SPurK-0007c5-VB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 03 May 2012 13:10:12 +0100 Received: from [77.238.189.54] by nm2.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2012 12:10:09 -0000 Received: from [212.82.108.225] by tm7.bullet.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2012 12:10:09 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 May 2012 12:10:09 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 678987.25661.bm@omp1002.bt.mail.ird.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 22942 invoked from network); 3 May 2012 12:10:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Cv2Wt+Zvjbs8xRGgd2BBoOn0GkCK2GISZ08nYKP2iQ3rcr5oo3izE26P3xkPj4nYWYwPLorGkmacgVtwzHLf8K6CPsxKM2Fgm6LlSMFHwa+TsIHoNZaEvZ0GsIYiFSY4ac3IeMm++56ZsEy34eF8v156AP9LNXJzr0alo9iMA6Y= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=s1024; t=1336047009; bh=DFaZdzX8Uo9aTzXEfctjQgsrb1L2rCMnibD+phYqdBw=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status; b=Y50pPIMG8QTWBBVH1voCP1+H5ESRfIKQjT4uKyyysuGkH13Gvlr4h7mgZw0ZH5DqUbghMSE8pD6sKVgitKYYwOSmDU8sl/pdkEJzuuB+1GhpTPr5R2+ls2KO34NYjNaSKNatPq5atnXbpRhgnY0iC12lB9quFC+t2R+LO/1r1Fg= X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: iLfxnVsVM1la.sQAaT5Y3qzskIusM4TwnpZH4BB8Q8UNtPc _qaVMXuIoSS0tC3BhzndLiNhrWAxbECP0LiplaCMi16MO4uTGlp3repFpEIu z9YoquvwMbXemePyq9DiW117J2NrNpT_2kcPk.8EiDXB37MMtigLFHr4sEwm ZrL0WZToOc1Z3_qMbSiyILw7SEVt2DJvaBHR8T9dcF7KN9dp8tcL28D2bfeZ ryI8plTV4gQdrSaGqOQLS7_ptqIRvC0vh7YDr2plVzsNQKERhE0dwQ0zHlIq P4IN_NZ2w.lXPuPGNBUj71eRNVtHnLWLnS.UcOjRtHZQYa4H9nmT0mDOVMtQ agkBQ5stgELFtdoo6roXGiNobP7rvQHUXjCRuU1Scc55TpDkCTq1akDYo7ZR IZrY.bcE0Uouk7uXabh0vV88MFa.m0KLx4VGl X-Yahoo-SMTP: fpz.2VeswBBs59bVshRPmMN51lcO2lgFRIvE4XTqE8dRwOxd70E- Received: from lark (alan.melia@109.155.42.60 with login) by smtp826.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 03 May 2012 05:10:09 -0700 PDT Message-ID: <003d01cd2925$bc552d80$4001a8c0@lark> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <4FA22F76.5050601@internode.on.net> Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 12:34:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.2001 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.2001 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 120503-0, 03/05/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Bob great stuff!! that is a very interesting and useful plot you have. Well Done. One addition that is often added is a narrow band plot of the noise, just clear of the main signal. You do seem to have a very quiet location, so this may not be needed to identify local "miscreants" :-))...... see Scott Tilley's VE7TIL plots of DCF39. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [77.238.189.59 listed in list.dnswl.org] 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Subject: LF: Re: DCF39 from Tasmania Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:497259904:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 X-AOL-SCOLL-AUTHENTICATION: mail_rly_antispam_dkim-m009.2 ; domain : btinternet.com DKIM : fail x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60094fa275d93ec9 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none Hi Bob great stuff!! that is a very interesting and useful plot you have. Well Done. One addition that is often added is a narrow band plot of the noise, just clear of the main signal. You do seem to have a very quiet location, so this may not be needed to identify local "miscreants" :-))...... see Scott Tilley's VE7TIL plots of DCF39. However in the long term it acts as a very usefull "calibration and confidence" facility confirming that your aerial sensitivity is still in the right area. One difficulty with long term propagation monitoring is ensuring that the receiving station's parameters have not changed. If you can do that, you are sensibly able to determine when the best strengths are achieved during the year, and the effects of both small and major geomagnetic distrubances. Without it you are always wondering whether the signal has been affected by local weather or an increase in the band noise, or even a coroded connection (been there, done that :-)) ) etc. The levels you are seeing suggest that western Europe to VK7 is well within possibility. It just needs the right conditions for long enough and maybe the right transmission mode. Best Wishes Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob" To: Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 8:10 AM Subject: LF: DCF39 from Tasmania > I am continuing to monitor DCF39 every day. > A graph of the received signal strength and a screen capture are > available on my web page at: > > http://www.users.on.net/~bobw/dcf39/ > > > Bob VK7ZL > > > > > >