Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2669 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 17:36:31 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 17:36:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 25733 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2002 16:35:15 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 27 Sep 2002 16:35:15 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 17uy1L-0005eL-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:31:15 +0100 Received: from [212.1.130.1] (helo=smtp-1.visp.telinco.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17uy1L-0005eB-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:31:15 +0100 Received: from [212.1.151.19] (helo=RSGB613192) by smtp-1.visp.telinco.net with smtp (Exim 3.32 #1) id 17uxzA-0007Vz-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:29:01 +0100 Message-ID: <003d01c26643$4e792780$045bfea9@RSGB613192> From: "Andy talbot" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 17:29:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: LF: RE: Narrow CW filter using 32kHz clock crystals? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARKversion=2.31 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group This filter is shown in the LF Experimenters Handbook on page 25, as part of the outline design for a narrow bandwidth LF receiver. The frequency response I measured is given on page 26 If you view the output on a scope and hit it with a signal generator, as you tune over the passband, the response first appears as a bouncing trace which grows to its maximum over a few seconds. A step change causes it to ring for a few cycles - but bear in mind that all filters (except Gaussian designs) will ring. This just happens to be so narrow that the ringing is clearly visible on a scope - it is a rather surreal experience actually seeing the transmient response of a crystal filter in real time ! See you spotted the deliberate mistake on the spec, 50kHz impedance Quite correct, it should of course read 50 k ohm Andy G4JNT ----- Original Message ----- From: Ashlock,William To: Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 3:04 PM Subject: LF: RE: Re: Re: RE: Narrow CW filter using 32kHz clock crstals? > Hello Andy, Hugh, and all filter lovers, > > I'm concerned about the transient response since this is the REAL measure of > a good filter. How does it respond to a step input? It could ring for > minutes! > > Hugh, please post the results of the spectrum test when you complete it. > > Thanks, > Bill A > > >Hello Andy > >I think I've answered my own question here. > >I built the filter and it doesn't work with 50 ohm input/output impedance, > >but it DOES work with 50k ohms. Narrow isn't it ! I can just about hit the > right frequency with >a signal generator and see some sine wave on the > scope. I haven't had a chance to put it on the >spectrum analyser yet. > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the WorldCom Internet Managed Scanning Service - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.worldcom.com > >