Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10008 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2002 22:51:26 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 5 Jul 2002 22:51:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 29815 invoked from network); 5 Jul 2002 22:50:41 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 5 Jul 2002 22:50:41 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17Qbnd-0004w7-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 23:43:37 +0100 Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com ([194.73.73.81]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2) id 17Qbnc-0004w2-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 23:43:36 +0100 Received: from host62-7-15-78.in-addr.btopenworld.com ([62.7.15.78] helo=main) by tungsten.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #8) id 17Qbna-00011h-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2002 23:43:35 +0100 Message-ID: <003d01c22475$6532d940$4e0f073e@main> From: "Alan Melia" To: "LF-Group" Subject: LF: re 166.5kHz again Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 23:35:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Hi John thanks for the update. I had hoped that I might catch an odd 'peep' of a signal in the quiet periods overnight, using Argo on the 10 sec mode. I would be interested to know what his exact frequency is as I am willing to wind the bandwidth down and see if anything can be seen. It may be necessary to do clever things with loops to get the BC noise down a bit more, if I am to stand any real chance. I am trying to keep up with the propagation reports on my web site, but it is difficult not having a transatlantic reference signal at present. The short 2000km path suffers from lots of fading in quiet conditions, where the longer paths are less affected by higher orders of 'hops'. Still the DCF39 <> CT1DRP path does give some confirmation of when things are likely to be depressed. Cheers de Alan G3NYK alan.melia@btinternet.com http://www.alan.melia.btinternet.co.uk