Return-Path: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>
Received: (qmail 8155 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2001 21:26:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO murphys-inbound.servers.plus.net) (212.159.14.225)  by excalibur.plus.net with SMTP; 26 Jan 2001 21:26:13 -0000
Received: (qmail 13361 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2001 21:20:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70)  by murphys with SMTP; 26 Jan 2001 21:20:24 -0000
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14MGD1-00067S-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 21:15:03 +0000
Received: from tomts8.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.52] helo=tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14MGD0-00067K-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 26 Jan 2001 21:15:02 +0000
Received: from server1 ([216.209.138.149]) by tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with SMTP          id <20010126211418.EHTG10080.tomts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@server1>          for <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>;          Fri, 26 Jan 2001 16:14:18 -0500
Message-ID: <003d01c087dc$ce1a9f60$0a00a8c0@ThreeLakes.ca>
From: "Larry Kayser" <kayser@sympatico.ca>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <4.1.20010125141716.017e5680@pop.tiscalinet.it> <3.0.1.16.20010126104930.2c07643c@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be> <3.0.1.16.20010126184115.2c877920@mail.cc.kuleuven.ac.be>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: VA3LK seen in ON
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 16:13:03 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
Sender: <majordom@post.thorcom.com>

Rik:


> >I studied DFCW and the linear requirement is not possible of course.
followed by

> to avoid misunderstandings : DFCW does not need linear amplification.

I have just looked around and I can not find the file I referenced, please
send me a description of DFCW, I am of the impression, apparently wrong,
that DFCW involved dual frequencies, which I have interpreted as
simultaneous dual frequencies, which is apparently wrong.

Please send a description of DFCW, I want to understand it.

Thanks es 73

Larry
VA3LK