X-GM-THRID: 1203350633376413987 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf X-Gmail-Received: 6a16018e134bf50af3c1d3cd5484db652717731d Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.54.72.15 with SMTP id u15cs20751wra; Sun, 14 May 2006 04:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.222.11 with SMTP id u11mr1182768nfg; Sun, 14 May 2006 04:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id y23si4217309nfb.2006.05.14.04.03.12; Sun, 14 May 2006 04:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (gmail.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1FfEJc-0000pi-73 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:59:12 +0100 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1FfEJb-0000pZ-IV for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 11:59:11 +0100 Received: from smtp.telefonica.net ([213.4.149.66] helo=ctsmtpout4.frontal.correo) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1FfFp6-00008P-Fv for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 13:35:52 +0100 Received: from PC2 (83.36.171.6) by ctsmtpout4.frontal.correo (7.2.056.6) (authenticated as JPRADOES$telefonica.net) id 4464EAC60001A0AE for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 12:55:57 +0200 Message-ID: <003c01c67744$f08f9160$2201a8c0@PC2> From: "Jose Manuel" To: Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 12:55:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,FORGED_RCVD_HELO=0.05,HTML_40_50=0.086,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001 Subject: LF: DCF39 ERP and field strength Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0039_01C67755.B3B44860" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5428 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C67755.B3B44860 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all In the web of Geri, DK8KW, can be seen that DCF39 ERP is 40KW (22KW = EMRP), based on measurements made by Geri some years ago. For this = radiater power corresponds, at 1800 Km, in function of inverse of = distance, 58 dB(uV/m); last nigth I made measurement of 60 dB(uV/m), so = I wonder if still DCF39=B4s power is the same as before, and if the = previous theorical field strength, with no reflection loss, can be = exceeded some times due to the several propagation factors involved. 73 de Jos=E9, EA1PX ------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C67755.B3B44860 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all

In the web of Geri, DK8KW, can be seen = that DCF39=20 ERP is 40KW (22KW EMRP), based on measurements made by Geri some years = ago. For=20 this radiater power corresponds, at 1800 Km, in function of inverse of = distance,=20 58 dB(uV/m); last nigth I made measurement of 60 dB(uV/m), so I wonder = if still=20 DCF39=B4s power is the same as before, and if the previous theorical = field=20 strength, with no reflection loss, can be exceeded some times due to the = several=20 propagation factors involved.

73 de Jos=E9, = EA1PX

------=_NextPart_000_0039_01C67755.B3B44860--