Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
	by mtain-mb04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id BD6B738000081;
	Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:38:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
	id 1TbYq2-0004aV-3W
	for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:37:14 +0000
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
	by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
	id 1TbYq1-0004aM-Jw
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:37:13 +0000
Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.24])
	by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <jrusgrove@comcast.net>)
	id 1TbYpz-0000Qj-Gu
	for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:37:12 +0000
Received: from omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.73])
	by qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id ScWv1k0071ap0As51fcphA; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:36:49 +0000
Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9])
	by omta22.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id Sfcp1k0050CFS1j3ifcpes; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 15:36:49 +0000
Message-ID: <003a01cdc8c7$30060380$6401a8c0@JAYDELL>
From: <jrusgrove@comcast.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <001801cdc8ac$2d178a60$6401a8c0@JAYDELL> <50AE1E19.1030501@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2012 10:36:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 2.6 (++)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 Content preview:  Stefan Reviewed the captures and there is one that shows a
    weak signal on about 136.174 ... but not enough to ID. Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
    [...] 
 Content analysis details:   (2.6 points, 5.0 required)
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
                             trust
                             [76.96.62.24 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM          Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
                             (jrusgrove[at]comcast.net)
 -0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
 -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD        Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
  2.9 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D
X-Scan-Signature: f38d515a9cad1e977fcfe251941a8120
Subject: Re: LF: T/A
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no 
	version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d601850ae46e76b2e
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Stefan

Reviewed the captures and there is one that shows a weak signal on about 136.174 ... but not enough 
to ID.

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2012 7:44 AM
Subject: Re: LF: T/A


> Hello Jay,
>
> Very good!! Thank you very much. It never stops to be fascinating for me to leave some traces 
> across the pond :-)
> It's a good SNR for that -27 nT!
>
> You may check your grab images for traces of DF2JP who has a stronger signal since some time. He 
> was on 136.174 kHz, also well visible at TF3HZ. His strength is roughly 2 dB below DF6NM.
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>
>
> Am 22.11.2012 13:23, schrieb jrusgrove@comcast.net:
>> Good signals from Stefan and Markus ... DST recovering to about -27nT.  Selected capture at 
>> http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html . Fadeout just after 0700Z.
>>
>> Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
>