Return-Path: Received: from mtain-me08.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtain-me08.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.96.144]) by air-db04.mail.aol.com (v129.4) with ESMTP id MAILINDB042-861e4cb5d6da36c; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:57:14 -0400 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by mtain-me08.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id B242B380000C0; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:57:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1P63g7-0004Zq-2q for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:55:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1P63g6-0004Zh-KW for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:55:42 +0100 Received: from out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net ([62.24.128.240]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P63g4-0005Pw-7j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:55:42 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhkGAKpztUxcEY29/2dsb2JhbACBRZIUjXZxvT+FSASBW4t/ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,326,1283727600"; d="scan'208,217";a="308134755" Received: from unknown (HELO xphd97xgq27nyf) ([92.17.141.189]) by out1.ip04ir2.opaltelecom.net with SMTP; 13 Oct 2010 16:55:33 +0100 Message-ID: <003a01cb6aef$0fe6e7f0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> From: "mal hamilton" To: References: <000c01cb6abb$719bb6d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <001a01cb6acd$586783d0$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <4CB5D2FE.50808@telus.net> Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:55:30 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR=0.276 Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0037_01CB6AF7.71806F60" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_40_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d60904cb5d6d832c6 X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25 X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01CB6AF7.71806F60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable A couple of weeks ago you referred to the 9 kcs band as a CrackPot ban= d, hardly encouraging for those dedicated to having fun dreaming on th= at frequency g3kev ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Scott Tilley=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 4:40 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: Ground proximity antennas Didn't you miss Stefan's last 8970 signal and log the neighbour's to= aster instead? On 10/13/2010 11:54 AM, mal hamilton wrote:=20 Beverages are not efficient on RX either but have directional adva= ntages. I have never missed any DX signals by not having one. G3KEV ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Rik Strobbe=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:05 AM Subject: LF: RE: Ground proximity antennas Beverage antenna (also) for transmitting : http://nrcdxas.org/ar= ticles/Beverage0183.pdf 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T ----------------------------------------------------------------------= ---- Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@bla= cksheep.org] namens mal hamilton [g3kevmal@talktalk.net] Verzonden: woensdag 13 oktober 2010 11:46 Aan: rsgb Onderwerp: LF: Ground proximity antennas Antennas described on here recently on or near the ground are on= ly variations of Beverage antennas and inefficient for Transmitting bu= t useful for Receiving under certain circumstances G3KEV ------=_NextPart_000_0037_01CB6AF7.71806F60 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
A couple of weeks ago you referred to= the 9 kcs=20 band as a CrackPot band, hardly encouraging for those dedicated to hav= ing fun=20 dreaming on that frequency
g3kev
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Sco= tt Tilley=20
Sent: Wednesday, October 13,= 2010 4:40=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Re: RE: Grou= nd proximity=20 antennas

Didn't you miss Stefan's last 8970 signal and log the= =20 neighbour's toaster instead?



On 10/13/2010 11:54 AM,= mal=20 hamilton wrote:=20
Beverages are not efficient on RX= either but=20 have directional advantages. I have never missed any DX signals by= not=20 having one.
G3KEV
 
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Rik=20 Strobbe
Sent: Wednesday, October= 13, 2010=20 11:05 AM
Subject: LF: RE: Ground= proximity=20 antennas

Beverage antenna (also) for transmitting : http://nrcdxas.org/articles/Beverage0183.pdf
 
73, Rik  ON7YD - OR7T
 
 
Van: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org]=20 namens mal hamilton [g3kevmal@talktalk.net]Verzonden:=20 woensdag 13 oktober 2010 11:46
Aan: rsgb
Onderwe= rp:=20 LF: Ground proximity antennas

Antennas described on here rece= ntly on or=20 near the ground are only variations of Beverage antennas and ine= fficient=20 for Transmitting but useful for Receiving under certain=20 circumstances
G3KEV
 
------=_NextPart_000_0037_01CB6AF7.71806F60--