X-GM-THRID: 1228756773736665557 X-Gmail-Labels: rsgb lf Delivered-To: daveyxm@gmail.com Received: by 10.65.98.14 with SMTP id a14cs143765qbm; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:22:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.26.7 with SMTP id d7mr2127619ugj.1171833776575; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:22:56 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b23si8042943ugd.2007.02.18.13.22.55; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 13:22:56 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 193.82.116.20 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org) Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1HItRb-0002SW-SR for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:19:39 +0000 Received: from [193.82.59.130] (helo=relay2.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1HItRb-0002SN-B0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:19:39 +0000 Received: from smtp14.orange.fr ([193.252.23.69]) by relay2.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HItRY-0002U1-Ep for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:19:39 +0000 Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1409.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 55B5B700009D for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:19:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from acer9412 (ARouen-251-1-174-96.w90-23.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.23.209.96]) by mwinf1409.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 18550700009C for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2007 22:19:30 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20070218211930997.18550700009C@mwinf1409.orange.fr Message-ID: <003a01c753a2$78f073a0$bd01a8c0@acer9412> From: "F6CWN" To: References: <20070217201022.ds328vq8mpwkg0go@webmail.versatel.de><001701c752f0$bac5c3a0$0300a8c0@lark> <20070218202234.18ouhfoji6osc0go@webmail.versatel.de> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 21:19:27 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: Re: Sine or not sine, that is the question... Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 2620 18./02/2007 2118z The win of the Man counters the machine,bravo Uwe! VY 73: Jeff ----- Original Message -----=20 From: To: Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 7:22 PM Subject: Re: LF: Re: Sine or not Hi Jeff, hi Alan, sri for being so late with the response. > I use 54=B5H air coils Jeff, here are two 54=B5H ring core coils in use. they did and do a good = job up to 1kW output. > What is it like a lower power levels ?? Alan, it was all the same, 10W or 800W. > what if there is insulator leakage to find the defect I connected a aerial dummy to the end of the feeder (8= 0m long) in the first step: all the same! second ?accidentally- step: I=20 manually moved the phasemeter somewhat ? surprise: sines like they have to be on t= he screen! I am ashamed to tell you that inside the phasemeter (homebrew) a ?naked-=20 wire touched the case. thanks for the hints and best regards Uwe/dj8wx