Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7872 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 17:19:24 -0000 Received: from warrior.services.quay.plus.net (212.159.14.227) by mailstore with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 17:19:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 10755 invoked from network); 16 Dec 2002 17:19:25 -0000 Received: from post.thorcom.com (193.82.116.70) by warrior.services.quay.plus.net with SMTP; 16 Dec 2002 17:19:24 -0000 X-SQ: A Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.10) id 18NytX-0006S2-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:19:07 +0000 Received: from [62.253.162.46] (helo=mta06-svc.ntlworld.com) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18NytX-0006Rt-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:19:07 +0000 Received: from oemcomputer ([80.4.106.77]) by mta06-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with SMTP id <20021216171903.TECF20174.mta06-svc.ntlworld.com@oemcomputer> for ; Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:19:03 +0000 Message-ID: <003a01c2a527$4f8c5660$4d6a0450@oemcomputer> From: "Mike Dennison" To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <000b01c2a4ff$bc781fc0$ea00a8c0@f3a3a2> <000601c2a50e$0b89ca60$4d6a0450@oemcomputer> <3DFDE74B.7725145F@diolog.de> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2002 17:19:37 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Subject: Re: LF: Re: QSO format Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01, USER_AGENT_OEversion=2.42 Sender: Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group > > On a general point about QRSS procedures, I still see 'TNX' or 'TKS' being > > sent, 'TU' is much shorter. Also do we need to send the very long '73'? > > The "TKS" and "73" is sent by W4DEX on 40m; I guess that will be in normal > speed and not QRSS ? :) > > 73, Fabian dj1yfk Yes, but I was talking about ordinary EU QRSS3 QSOs. Perhaps I should have put that in a separate e-mail. Mike, G3XDV http://www.lf.thersgb.net ====================