Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27617 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2000 15:00:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO post.thorcom.com) (212.172.148.70) by dimple.core.plus.net.uk with SMTP; 7 Mar 2000 15:00:14 -0000 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12SLMZ-00049T-00 for rsgb_lf_group-outgoing@blacksheep.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2000 14:53:31 +0000 Received: from rubellite.lion-access.net ([212.19.217.4]) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 12SLMY-00049O-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2000 14:53:31 +0000 Received: from w8k3f0 (1Cust11.tnt17.rtm1.nl.uu.net [213.53.8.11]) by rubellite.lion-access.net (I-Lab) with SMTP id AEECA2826 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2000 14:52:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <003a01bf8845$bd4fae60$01fa88d4@w8k3f0> From: "Dick Rollema" To: "LF-Group" Subject: LF: Cross band QSO's 73/136 kHz Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2000 15:55:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group Sender: Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit

To All from PA0SE

Just made cross band normal CW QSO's with M0BMU (sent 559, received 559) and G3LDO (sent 569, received 559). My antenna system was tuned to 136 kHz. But tuning to 73 kHz probably would not have resulted in better reports because I guessed the signal strength by comparing the signal to the noise and this relation would not be better with the antenna system tuned for 73 kHz.

The background noise was the same as this morning with Rugby off the air so apparently the Rugby noise sidebands do no hamper reception overhere.

73, Dick, PA0SE