Message-ID: <003901cc9982$a42a1000$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf>
From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <BLU153-W31B99909FEEC02FEFADD59CFD40@phx.gbl> <CAMFjj71YS_99uZVZd0vTiAqxCO8BXd6Oz659kZE+jAxmRotC4g@mail.gmail.com> <002301cc997d$217d8e20$0401a8c0@xphd97xgq27nyf> <3D3E03958F864EB19FDA9062A7487336@konda03bf4520e>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:12:45 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: bad format  
Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0  
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d41174eb17a633cda
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none


Yes but that is more work and effort plus my antenna is not resonant on the
proposed lower frequencies even more work.
I have a lovely analogue VFO but it does not cover the new range nor my
Xtals


g3kev

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joze Konda - S52AB" <s52ab@siol.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?


> DDS Generator to retrieve the situation...
> 73, Joze, s52ab
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "mal hamilton" <g3kevmal@talktalk.net>
> To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 5:33 PM
> Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
>
>
> > MF
> > How did they arrive at that frequency range? No where near where we are
at
> > present. New VFO'S and Xtals etc
> > de mal/g3kev
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Warren Ziegler" <wd2xgj@gmail.com>
> > To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2011 3:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: LF: 5 Whats?
> >
> >
> > Hi Laurence,
> >
> >     5 Watts? Do we get to have 40 channels and use a 'power mic' with
> > reverb?
> > Come On!
> >
> > 73 Warren K2ORS
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Laurence KL7UK
> > <hellozerohellozero@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> During the meeting of the CEPT WRC-12 Conference Preparatory Group held
> >> in
> >> Bucharest between November 1st-4th 2011 an European Common Proposal was
> >> agreed. This ECP represents the block vote of 48 administrations and
was
> >> passed without dissent. It proposes an allocation to the amateur
service
> >> between 472-480 kHz on a secondary basis with a maximum power limit of
5W
> >> eirp.
> >> This ECP will now be forwarded to the ITU as a contribution from CEPT.
> >> I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of those who
> > participated
> >> in the work of the working group that led to the adoption of this
> >> proposal. Also thanks are due to those European Member Societies who
> >> helped to influence their national administrations in this matter.
> >> Now for WRC-12.
> >> Colin, G3PSM
> >> CEPT Co-ordinator for Agenda Item 1.23
> >>
> >>
> >> Laurence KL7UK
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > 73 Warren K2ORS
> > WD2XGJ
> > WD2XSH/23
> > WE2XEB/2
> > WE2XGR/1
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> > No virus found in this message.
> > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> > Version: 10.0.1411 / Virus Database: 2092/3990 - Release Date: 11/01/11
> >
>
>