Return-Path: <owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25])
by mtain-dk04.r1000.mx.aol.com (Internet Inbound) with ESMTP id 630593800008B;
Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:14:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14)
id 1SeO5e-0007oz-6v
for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:12:46 +0100
Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net)
by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1SeO5d-0007oq-EN
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:12:45 +0100
Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.48])
by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.77)
(envelope-from <jrusgrove@comcast.net>)
id 1SeO5b-0006s6-4Q
for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:12:44 +0100
Received: from omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35])
by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id MNBY1j0020ldTLk55NChin; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:12:41 +0000
Received: from JAYDELL ([71.234.119.9])
by omta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
id MNCg1j00X0CFS1j3QNCgpu; Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:12:40 +0000
Message-ID: <003701cd4883$e6965560$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL>
From: <jrusgrove@comcast.net>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <4FD66C8A.5050402@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 06:12:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+)
X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
Content preview: Sefan Somehow missed your e mail so no report from here. With
the DST at 'disturbed' levels it is unlikely that I would have had reception
of your signals. It might be a good idea to check http://lasp.colorado.edu/space_weather/dsttemerin/dsttemerin.html
for the DST levels before an overnight T/A attempt. Generally speaking, condx
are favorable when the DST has been at -10 nt or better for a couple days.
The second chart down shows that the 9th or 10th would have been better T/A
nights. The big dip starting on the 10th is a problem. [...]
Content analysis details: (1.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no
trust
[76.96.62.48 listed in list.dnswl.org]
0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
(jrusgrove[at]comcast.net)
-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
domain
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D AXB_XMAILER_MIMEOLE_OL_4379D
X-Scan-Signature: 046f068074e745d5c60ca47deee9b503
Subject: LF: Re: Beacon to the west
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="ISO-8859-15";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=NO_REAL_NAME autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group
X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false
x-aol-global-disposition: G
X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:463185024:93952408
X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1db4084fd716794e57
X-AOL-IP: 195.171.43.25
X-AOL-SPF: domain : blacksheep.org SPF : none
Sefan
Somehow missed your e mail so no report from here. With the DST at 'disturbed' levels it is unlikely
that I would have had reception of your signals. It might be a good idea to check
http://lasp.colorado.edu/space_weather/dsttemerin/dsttemerin.html for the DST levels before an
overnight T/A attempt. Generally speaking, condx are favorable when the DST has been at -10 nt or
better for a couple days. The second chart down shows that the 9th or 10th would have been better
T/A nights. The big dip starting on the 10th is a problem.
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefan Schäfer" <Stefan.Schaefer@iup.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:09 PM
Subject: LF: Beacon to the west
> LF,
>
> Once again i'm transmitting DFCW-90 on 136.172 kHz over the night. The TX is already on air...
>
> In a few days the sunshine time is as long as possible here, so it may be a bit difficult to
> become visible in TA. But who knows...
>
> At least the summer time allows excellent results on LF for distances below 3000 km. Probably
> because the area in darkness is small on the northern hemisphere and so the noise from far away is
> attenuated. So the distances within the first hop range may be a bit lower than in winther but
> maybe the noise is even lower so S/N improvement of some dB results.
> At least i've never been audible in winther at YO/4X1RF. We've done many tests and the radiated
> signal was even 3 dB stronger than a few days ago where the signal became audible. Now i'm
> thinking different about the possibilities of that band in the summer time!!
>
>
> 73, Stefan/DK7FC
>