DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=btinternet.com;
  h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-Antivirus:X-Antivirus-Status;
  b=O8P5vetIEjpI6MsrqFbUsDF94WmB/cT6TToHdxM72S/75iS6tWoTTLOGI5kfCVloIammJKOLHPA+/YYXYeoyAaUCG+6G11qvwsVQugvvMKfza6amXtmZANhh9KM9EHLSvxD2K6jGjAxLDojgpkqle5BFoZ/kySAdsvjNHNg47ys=  ;
Message-ID: <003701cbbd63$daa305c0$4001a8c0@lark>
From: "Alan Melia" <alan.melia@btinternet.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
References: <AANLkTikyJaa3tD+HK4M0nHG5JcYWtRQEiTQZCwqcQP3Y@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTim6O3grPfge_L_tZiz0t+xACPruNiYy0Le8C1mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:12:26 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
DomainKey-Status: good (testing) 
Subject: Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org


There is still a UK allocation smack in the midlle of the old band......now
in the VT Comms (Anthorn?) portfolio I guess.....this made reception very
difficult here when it was continually idling at Rugby. They might be less
understanding about an amateur band there than BT/Admiralty was. It seemed
significant that the NoV were terminated when VT took over that service.

Alan G3NYK


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Talbot" <andy.g4jnt@gmail.com>
To: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: LF: A 73kHz allocation again?


> AAAArrrrrgggghhhh
>
> Sold the old 73kHz loading coil at FR Hamfest last year :-)
>
> But yes.   73 was more interesting that 137 turned out to be, whilst not
> being impossible to do something worthwhile for everyone who managed to
get
> on.
>
> Andy
> www.g4jnt.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 26 January 2011 10:38, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Looking at recent plots and listed VLF/LF stations active there would
> > appear to be room in the 70-74kHz region for some amateur activity in
Europe
> > without risk to other services. I wonder, seriously, if we asked OFCOM
(and
> > other authorities in Europe) for NoV access to the 73kHz band whether it
> > would be granted. They were helpful and supportive with regard to
8.7-9.1kHz
> > NoVs and seem to accept that genuine research activities warrant support
and
> > encouragement. After all, only a handful of people would be interested.
> >
> > With the progress in weak signal work since the 73kHz band was last
> > available in the UK and with the new experiences of some at 8.97kHz (and
> > 136kHz), there is surely a good case to support this as an experimental
> > allocation via a NoV. I'd be keen to try earth mode and radiated tests
> > (locally) at 73kHz.
> >
> > What do people think? Should I ask OFCOM like I did for the Dreamer's
Band
> > NoV and see what happens or should this be via the RSGB?
> >
> > 73s
> > Roger G3XBM
> >
> > --
> > g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.com/
> > www.g3xbm.co.uk
> > www.youtube.com/user/g3xbm
> > <http://vlf_grabber/>G3XBM   GQRP 1678    ISWL G11088
> >
> >
<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.htm
l#12dc1ea113ae1f2c_>
> >
<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.htm
l#12dc1ea113ae1f2c_>
> >
<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.htm
l#12dc1ea113ae1f2c_>
> >
<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/html/compose/static_files/blank_quirks.htm
l#12dc1ea113ae1f2c_>
> >
>