Return-Path: Received: from rly-dg01.mx.aol.com (rly-dg01.mail.aol.com [172.19.151.85]) by air-dg01.mail.aol.com (v121_r5.5) with ESMTP id MAILINDG011-5a14971c22474; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:34:08 -0500 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [193.82.116.20]) by rly-dg01.mx.aol.com (v121_r4.4) with ESMTP id MAILRELAYINDG016-5a14971c22474; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 06:33:57 -0500 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1LO9PU-0002zd-TM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:32:16 +0000 Received: from [193.82.116.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1LO9PU-0002zU-FO for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:32:16 +0000 Received: from mx6.mail.ru ([194.67.23.26]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LO9PT-0004MZ-GL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:32:16 +0000 Received: from [79.98.8.6] (port=25695 helo=EFREMOV) by mx6.mail.ru with asmtp id 1LO9PM-0004X8-00 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:32:08 +0300 X-Nat-Received: 172.16.10.160 Message-ID: <003701c97897$39a3f110$8cd9160a@EFREMOV> From: "Andrey rn3agc" To: References: <496E6B45.5020100@usa.net> <0F3DBBAC61C545AE85525CD884B642EC@Black> <20090114231729.6b8aea4f@lurcher> <2AD1A31DF27448F495C0CE7FF33CE9DE@Black> <1E6D0A88C4DE49E5A2AF05911187E7A3@Black> <424931F60B3D4F41AB7DCB9E9FCAB3C5@big7368b9a7d3d> <000e01c97703$df2dfcb0$8d01a8c0@JAYDELL> <5E6F6CB3C59741678D3AE19CEA22B373@JimPC> <45AE4BD5B9164F9A929A6A98D89CF1E6@cahal.danet> <008901c9772e$3b16a2f0$8cd9160a@EFREMOV> <49708674.5080009@telia.com> <006701c97814$91b188a0$8cd9160a@EFREMOV> <1F4FBFE39AD245A3B4A2DDAA4361BA7C@Black> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 11:24:38 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Spam: Not detected X-Mras: Ok X-Karma: unknown: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: autolearn=disabled,none Subject: Re: LF: WSPR does not work Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-AOL-IP: 193.82.116.20 Hello Markus, Many thanks! Samplerate my sound card 96 khz, deviation 14 hz. I have tried all possible variants of reception which were advised to me by you and other participants rsgb-reflector. But the positive result is not present. Tried to accept also program WSJT7. And I with pleasure would try to change the sound card, but I work with a laptop. I stop attempts of reception WSPR until then when there will be a possibility to experiment with other computer. 73 Andrey RN3AGC in KO85SV > Hi Andrey, > > this has been mentioned before - have you checked your ADC samplerate? See http://www.wsprnet.org/drupal/node/339. If tx and rx > samplerate deviated by say only 0.3% (ie. 36 Hz from 12 kHz), the bit timing would have shifted by half a symbol duration at the > end > of the 162 bit message. I started having doubts about my own DAC rate when Graham reported negative decoding, but the TX audio > frequency seems to be correct to within a fraction of a Hz. You could roughly check the rx samplerate by injecting a known 1.5 > kHz > tone and use WSPR spectrogram which resolves ~ 0.1%. Regarding other digital modes, I recall that samplerate was very critical > for > WOLF which relies on a coherent bit frame over a long integration period. On the other hand, it's not much of an issue for PSK31 > which is "freerunning" only for a few symbols. > > The maximum tolerable PC clock error between tx and rx seems to be 2.2 seconds. This was the last displayed dt offset before I > lost > track of Jim's consistent signal the other morning. My PC clock is slightly slow and would need resetting more often. But you > mentioned you have that under tight control. > > The WSPR program does not seem to be disturbed or overloaded by strong out-of band signals. Inserting a 200 Hz filter before the > decoder made no difference at all, even though the total audio power was reduced by 20 or 30 dB. I also did not see any > degradation > when I used very low audio levels. The WSPR spectrogram seems to have a display leveling similar to the Argo AGC option, as the > colours do not change when the audio gain is varied. > > Best wishes > Markus, DF6NM > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andrey rn3agc" > To: > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:56 PM > Subject: Re: LF: WSPR does not work > > > Hello Johan, James, LF, > Many thanks for the help! Yesterday WSPR-signal DF6NM > passed here from time to time much more strongly, than the day > before yesterday. But decoding still was not. I have installed WSJT7. > If again the result is negative, the problem most likely in a sound card > means. Though to this case without problems decoded any amateur > digital protocols. > > 73 > Andrey RN3AGC in KO85SV > > >